Thursday, January 16, 2020

2019 Year End Report: Most Disappointing Films

I do have a Worst of list coming up, but I always find it more depressing to my most disappointing list – because each of these films are ones I was really looking to, and just didn’t live up to those expectations. Some of them aren’t even that bad – they’re mediocre – but when I think of what they could have been; you cannot help but be let done.
 
Before we get to my list of the most disappoint, there are these films: All is True (Kenneth Branagh) which finds Branagh playing Shakespeare – and not even in an interesting way – when he probably should just adapt more Shakespeare plays. Charlie Says (Mary Harron) wants to be a different kind of Manson family story – but doesn’t really hit the right note, and wants to excuse too many of the Manson girl’s actions. Dark Phoenix (Simon Kinberg) is a story that should work in the X-Men movie universe, but they’ve messed it up twice now, and this one far worse than the first one. The Death and Life of John F. Donovan (Xavier Dolan) is another misfire from Dolan – whose career is faltering a little. Domino (Brian DePalma) shows that DePalma still has it – the set pieces are brilliant, but nothing else is so my hope for another great DePalma film continues to be unfulfilled. Everybody Knows (Asghar Farhadi) is a finely acted, beautiful melodrama – but coming from Farhadi, I expect much, much more. Hellboy (Neil Marshall) is the type of comic book property that should be impossible to make as boring as this one is. In the Tall Grass (Vincenzo Natali) took a very disturbing story co-written by Stephen King, and completely undermines it. The Kid Who Would Be King (Joe Cornish) is a fine kids film – but when we waited this long for Cornish to follow-up Attack the Block, and this is what we get, it’s still a letdown. The Laundromat (Steven Soderbergh) is the auteur’s least interesting film since his comeback – it wants to be The Big Short, but is nowhere near that good. Rambo: Last Blood (Adrian Grunberg) was a real letdown, given that the last film in the series – 2008’s Rambo – was one of the best in the series, next only to First Blood. Terminator: Dark Fate (Tim Miller) surprised me in that I didn’t think I could still be disappointed by Terminator movies – but this one did, because it teased us with the Linda Hamilton film we want, and instead delivered a bland action film. Triple Frontier (J.C. Chandor) is the first film of his his career I didn’t really, really like – and it comes after a long layoff as well – making it doubly disappointing. Velvet Buzzsaw (Dan Gilroy) has a promising setup, but doesn’t quite pay it off properly – it’s a good film, but I keep hoping that Gilroy has another Nightcrawler in him. Where’d You Go, Bernadette (Richard Linklater) is an interesting film in many ways, with a good performance by Blanchett – but from Linklater, it’s another film that doesn’t reach his heights. I would probably have been more disappointed in Zombieland: Double Tap (Ruben Fleischer) had it come out years ago – when it made more sense for it to exist – but it’s still a bit of a letdown.
 
10. The Goldfinch (John Crowley)
The way some critics talked about The Goldfinch you would think the film was an absolute disaster. It really isn’t – what it really is an honest attempt to shove a massive brink of a novel into a two-and-a-half-hour runtime, and not quite figuring out how to do it. Part of that is that the book, which is so heavily built on coincidence, seems a little silly on the screen – especially when you have to rush through everything, so that by the time we get to a finale with guns and gangsters, it seems silly. I do admire some of the performances (Nicole Kidman is very good, as is Oakes Fegley – and Ansel Elgort does what he can with a very passive role) and the cinematography Roger Deakins is quite lovely. But I did love the book when I read it a few years ago, and given that Crowley is the director behind the wonderful and lovely Brooklyn, this ends up being a disappointing film. A valiant effort perhaps, but a movie that doesn’t work.
 
9. Yesterday (Danny Boyle)
I didn’t hate Yesterday – hell, I saw it twice (once in theaters solo, once with my wife at home) but I do think the idea behind the film – that one day we all wake up and The Beatles never existed, and everyone save for one aspiring singer-songwriter has no idea what they are missing – is great, and the execution is dull and predictable. That probably has something to do with the screenwriter – Richard Curtis – who has never met a concept he cannot make into a romcom, which takes the film is the most predictable way it could possibly go. And I’m still not quite sure what to make of the “surprise” cameo near the end of the film – that some downright hated, but I’m fairly indifferent to. It’s also a Danny Boyle film – something I keep forgetting, because his trademark style and energy just isn’t there. I appreciate that the film found an audience – films like this struggle to do so these days – but the film just doesn’t do anything it could have as well as it could have done it – not even the music.
 
8. Motherless Brooklyn (Edward Norton)
I always thought that Edward Norton should direct more films – I liked his debut way back in 2000, Keeping the Faith, and the rumors of how involved he gets in the projects he acts in makes me think he has a director brain. So it’s pretty disappointing to see his long awaited for follow-up – a would-be Chinatown inspired noir, set in New York in the 1950s with Norton playing a detective with Tourette’s uncovering a vast conspiracy, was so poorly executed. The film is overly packed with plot – which means that no one other than Norton gets time to become much of a character. Worse still, Norton’s performance is more distracting that anything else – he’s at his best at his most toned down. Even worse, the look of the film is off – the film has a shiny sheen to its cinematography that is all wrong for noir. The film is long (nearly two-and-a-half hours) and isn’t boring, but isn’t the film I was hoping for from either Norton the actor, nor Norton the director.
 
7. Dumbo (Tim Burton)
Perhaps it’s my fault for expecting too much from Tim Burton. I actually think Dumbo is probably better than Aladdin or The Lion King this year (even if only a fraction of the number of people saw it) – but I didn’t expect as much from those – the looked exactly like what they were – warmed over versions of more recent Disney classics. But the Burton who made films like Edward Scissorhands or Ed Wood would seem like the perfect filmmaker to make Dumbo – to connect with the melancholy of the original – and given that the film wasn’t slavish in its devotion to the original, you may have thought Burton could do that. But Burton isn’t that filmmaker anymore – he hasn’t been in a long time – and he seems to be okay with that. He’s on autopilot here – as he normally is nowadays – and there’s just nothing here to really enjoy. I don’t think future Burton films will make a list like this from me – because at this point, I think I’m done expecting good films from him.
 
6. Lucy in the Sky (Noah Hawley)
Fargo is one of the best shows of the last decade – so when the showrunner behind that great show, Noah Hawley, makes his feature debut, I was looking forward to it – especially when you consider he cast Natalie Portman, Jon Hamm, Zazie Beetz, Ellen Burstyn and Dan Stevens – and it is based on one of the strangest true crime cases in recent memory – about an astronaut accused of trying to kidnap another astronaut. What Hawley delivered though was a story that takes things way too seriously, and yet somehow not seriously enough. So when Natalie Portman starts spiraling downwards – something she excels at – none of it make a lot of sense, and the film spins out of control. It doesn’t help that Hawley tries so many directorial tricks that its a distraction. Hawley is clearly talented – but his debut film was a misfire from someone who has done great work on TV, but hasn’t cracked movies just yet.
 
5. Gemini Man (Ang Lee)
It may not be fair, but I want the old Ang Lee back – the filmmaker who made Sense and Sensibility, The Ice Storm, Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon, Brokeback Mountain and Lust Caution. What we’ve gotten instead from Lee in recent years is his experiments with high frame rates, and digital technology – which still isn’t where it should be in terms of with how it looks (although it’s getting better) but films that just don’t hit you as hard emotionally – nor look as good – as what Lee is capable of. Gemini Man is better than Billy Lynn’s Long Halftime Walk – and I appreciate that with every new technology someone needs to experiment with it – but why does it have to be Ang Lee? Let Michael Bay waste his time figuring this out – and let’s get Ang Lee back to being Ang Lee.
 
4. The Man Who Killed Don Quixote (Terry Gilliam)
I like passion projects – and I like it when auteurs finally get to make long gestating projects to the screen. But it doesn’t seem like many of those long gestating for a reason – and that reason being they’re not very good. Case in point, The Man Who Killed Don Quixote, which Terry Gilliam has been trying to get made for decades – one attempt is documented in the 2002 documentary Lost in La Mancha. Now it’s finally here – with Jonathan Pryce and Adam Driver – and like all Gilliam films it is a complete and total mess. But sometimes those messes can be absolutely glorious – Brazil, The Fisher King 12 Monkeys, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, etc. Here, it’s just messy. Like Burton, I’m not sure Gilliam is the same filmmaker he once was – or perhaps his problem is he’s trying too hard to be that filmmaker. Still, you would think when you’ve had decades to think of what you would do when you finally got to make your passion project – the result wouldn’t be this muddled mess.
 
3. Godzilla: King of Monsters (Michael Dougherty)
I know that I may be in the minority here, but I really do think that Gareth Edwards’ Godzilla (2014) was a great blockbuster – a new kind of blockbuster, for a world threaten by climate change. That was a film about the best laid plans of men all being useless – if the monsters we created wanted to destroy us, they would – and only another monster we created could save us. I loved it. I didn’t love Michael Dougherty’s Godzilla: King of Monsters – its sequel – which spends way too much time on its completely uninteresting human characters, and then crammed too many monsters in all together. I think Edwards was headed somewhere truly unique – and the sequel backs away from it. Too bad – we need some different takes on in the blockbuster realm.
 
2. Peterloo (Mike Leigh)
Up until Peterloo, you could argue that Mike Leigh has been a model of consistency – making a new film every two to three years, and almost all of them are wonderful – stretching all the way until the early 1990s (and maybe longer). Peterloo is another passion project of Leigh – he has been wanting to make this film for a long time – but it is completely opposite of the type of film that Leigh does well. It isn’t an intimate character driven drama – but instead of a very a sweeping epic of the events leading to the Peterloo massacre in England in 1819. The film has dozens of speaking roles and a massive scope – and yet it’s basically a lot of people talking at each other, either giving speeches to big crowds, or speeches to individuals. It’s a dull and lifeless film. The actual massacre – all of about 15 minutes of 150 – is quite good – but the rest just doesn’t match what Leigh does well.
 
1. Glass (M. Night Shyamalan)
I remember watching M. Night Shyamalan’s Unbreakable all the way back in 2000 – and really thinking that I was witnessing one of the early films of the new Hitchcock – something I had resisted when I saw (and really liked) The Sixth Sense the previous year. I don’t think I quite love it as much as I did then – as a 19-year-old – but I still think it’s a masterful film, and the best of Shyamalan’s career. The idea of following it up, 19 years later, bring back Bruce Willis’ hero, and Samuel L. Jackson’s villain – and adding in James McAvoy (from the stealth sequel Split, that we didn’t know until the last scene) was tantalizing – eve if Shyamalan has certainly fallen off that pedestal so long ago. Instead, what we ended up with was this – a talky, boring film in which there is a lot of meaningless plot and talk, and subplots – all leading to a messy conclusion that just doesn’t add up. Unbreakable remains a great film – a film ahead of its time as it foresaw our obsession with comic books movies. All these years later, Glass seems desperately behind the time. I cannot remember the last time I was this disappointed walking out of a movie theater.

No comments:

Post a Comment