Hal **** / *****
Directed by: Amy
Scott.
Hal Ashby
had one of the most remarkable decades any filmmaker has ever had in the 1970s
– a period of time in which he made seven films, all of which deserve to be
seen, and several of which help define the era. And yet, until recently, I
don’t think Ashby’s name was often mentioned in the same breath as filmmakers
like Robert Altman, Francis Ford Coppola or Martin Scorsese – whose films are
often seen as the defining films of that time, or even the likes of Peter
Bogdanovich or William Friedkin who, fairly or not, are often seen as figures
who had a great run of films in the 1970s, but whose careers kind of stalled
after that decade. It would be fair to say the same thing happened to Ashby –
who did make a few films in the 1980s, none of which are remembered fondly, and
then died in 1988 – when he was only 59. Was it his death that made him
overlooked – because he was prevented in speaking about that time in Hollywood
that became romanticized at some point in the 1990s? Was it that his films were
often quite different from each other, not because he was not an auteur, but
because you have to dig deeper to find those signifiers? But while Ashby’s name
was hardly ever mentioned alongside the giants of the 1970s – it would be unfair
to say his films were ever really forgotten. I only gradually realized that
there was a great director that wasn’t often talked about when you start
stacking up the films of his I watched.
Those
seven 1970s films were The Landlord, Harold & Maude, The Last Detail,
Shampoo, Bound for Glory, Coming Home and Being There – and while I don’t love
all of them, I love most of them (I have never been a huge fan of Harold and
Maude – although I have to admit that it is a film that sticks in your mind,
and its influence is undeniable). By the time Ashby started directing, he was
already an Oscar winner – for editing his good friend Norman Jewison’s In the
Heat of the Night – and it was Jewison who handed over the directing reins of
The Landlord to Ashby, because he felt Ashby was ready, and knew he really
wanted to do it.
Amy
Scott’s documentary Hal is half a tribute to those films, and half an
exploration of the man himself. Ashby had problems with authority his whole
life – growing up in Utah (never a Mormon, we hear him say at one point) – who
ran away from a wife and child in his late teens, and made his way to
Hollywood, where he kind of fell into moviemaking – and then fell in love with
it. He was always a great editor – his strength lied in being able to put
together the footage he shot in interesting, sometimes unexpected ways (one of
the ironies about his 1980s work is that often the studio would take the film
from him, and edit it themselves – thus taking away the aspect of filmmaking
Ashby was best at).
You can
argue that the film edges in hagiography at some points – but then again, the
film doesn’t shy away from people who would have a legitimate beef with him –
like that daughter he essentially abandoned early on (the film doesn’t get into
child support issues or anything – but one assumes he did pay). It’s that
everyone the film interviews really seemed to love Ashby. To his collaborators,
he was a great guy – someone who allowed them to experiment and do their best
work. It’s all those studio executives, who never believed in him, that he held
in contempt – who probably did hate him. But standing up and swearing to studio
executives is the type of thing Hollywood heroes do – and he certainly did,
often in writing. This was probably not the smartest thing in the world for him
to do – but it works wonders for this documentary, because it gives them a
treasure trove of things to read out.
The film
is also smart about the filmmakers it chooses to interview – it’s not the same
talking heads you see in most films talking about old filmmakers. There’s no
Scorsese or Bogdanovich. But it’s Alexander Payne, David O. Russell, Lisa
Cholodenko, who can tell you how much Ashby’s films meant to them growing up –
and how they influenced them.
I do
think Ashby is getting more and more notice as the years go by – and that run
of films is seen as the masterclass in filmmaking it was. My favorite will
always be Being There – with Peter Sellers as a simpleton, who becomes a political
genius to people for his simple sayings. That’s almost more relevant now than
ever. But you cannot go wrong with any of those films. See Hal – and then watch
them all.
No comments:
Post a Comment