Wednesday, July 3, 2019

Classic Movie Review: Alice in the Cities (1974)

Alice in the Cities (1974) 
Directed by: Wim Wenders.
Written by: Wim Wenders and Veith von Fürstenberg.
Starring: Rüdiger Vogler (Philip 'Phil' Winter), Yella Rottländer (Alice), Lisa Kreuzer (Lisa - Alice's Mother), Edda Köchl (Angela - Friend in New York), Ernest Boehm (Publisher), Sam Presti (Car Dealer), Lois Moran (Airport Hostess), Didi Petrikat (Friend in Frankfurt), Hans Hirschmüller (Police Officer), Sibylle Baier (The Woman).
 
The first film in Wim Wenders so called Road Trilogy is one of the simplest films Wenders ever made. It begins with a German journalist – recurring Wenders character Phil Winter (Rüdiger Vogler) travelling across America by car, and supposedly writing a story about America’s wide open spaces, but instead just taking a lot of pictures. When he gets to New York, his editor isn’t happy that he hasn’t written anything, and Phil has to get home to Berlin quickly, to write something – he’s low on money to boot. It’s in the airport that he meets Lisa (Lisa Kreuzer) and her daughter Alice (Yella Rottländer) – all of about 8. She’s also German, also needs to get home quickly – but like Phil, is stranded until the next flight the following day. They spend the night at a hotel together – not sexually – and when he wakes up, he finds that Lisa has essentially abandoned Alice in his care – telling him to fly off to Amsterdam with her daughter, and she’ll be along the next day. Against his better judgment, he does that – but, of course, Lisa doesn’t show up. They spend time in Amsterdam together, and then head to a series of small German towns – apparently looking for Alice’s grandmother. Alice doesn’t have an address – but knows where she lives, at least she thinks she does.
 
In many ways, Alice in the Cities works as a time capsule movie – capturing things that will never exist again. This is evident in the very premise of the plot of course – it would be unthinkable today for a stranger to take a Transatlantic flight with an 8-year-old they didn’t know these days. But it’s also in Phil’s view of America – and in particular New York. The New York we see here is in many ways tourist-y (the only way I’ve ever really seen it) – but that makes sense, since Phil himself is a tourist. You see landmarks that are gone forever, or forever changed in New York. In a sense, the romantic notion of driving across America is gone now too. What was once a chance to see a bunch of individual small towns and cities, each unique in their own way, would now just be a series of strip malls and chain stores – so that each place is exactly like the last. That is already sinking into to Phil as he drives across America anyway – and will become even clearer in Germany, as they go to one small town after another. The existential ennui is the same wherever he goes – Europe has become Americanized, somehow robbing both places of what once made them special.
 
In a strange way, what keeps Alice in the Cities from being just pretentious existential longing without much of a point is Alice herself – played in a remarkable performance by Rottländer. Her Alice is very much still a kid, and Wenders treats her as such. She is childlike in the way she talks and thinks – the way she lies to Phil. The way she sneaks off to a bathroom at the airport to cry when she realizes her mother isn’t there to collect her yet. There is a childlike simplicity to the way she sees things that plays nicely off of Phil. They have a goofy sort of chemistry together. The dialogue Wenders gives her would sound too simplistic, too on the nose, coming out of an adult’s mouth – but from a child, it makes sense. So many adults don’t know how to write for children – so they end up being little adults. Wenders doesn’t make this mistake.
 
The film was shot on 16MM by the great Robby Muller – who would be one of Wim Wenders best collaborators (and later, would do the same for Jim Jarmusch and Lars von Trier). Alice in the Cities is a beautiful film, but also an empty one. It captures these two contradictions perfectly. I don’t know how the film played when it came out in 1974 – today, it plays as if Phil is longing for a time that has already past, and we experience it also as a time that has long past – not just what he looked back to, but as us looking at him. Alice somehow grounds him – doesn’t allow him to become lost in his nostalgia for something he never experienced. Kids will do that to you.

No comments:

Post a Comment