Cemetery of Splendour
Directed by: Apichatpong
Weerasethakul
Written by: Apichatpong
Weerasethakul.
Starring: Jenjira Pongpas (Jenjira),
Banlop Lomnoi (Itt), Jarinpattra Rueangram (Keng), Petcharat Chaiburi (Nurse
Tet), Tawatchai Buawat (The Mediator), Sujittraporn Wongsrikeaw (Goddess 1), Bhattaratorn
Senkraigul (Goddess 2), Sakda Kaewbuadee (Teng), Richard Abramson (Richard
Widner).
About
half way into Apichatpong Weerasethakul’s Cemetery of Splendour, Jenjira
(Jenjira Pongpas) is praying at a shrine, giving offerings of small, carved
animals to a pair of goddess, and explaining what they are for to her American
husband, Richard. One is for her leg – she has one that is significantly
shorter than the other, and she needs to walk with braces. One is for his hand.
And the other is for their “new son” – Itt (Jarinpattra Rueangram), a soldier
in a deep sleep at the former school transformed into a hospital Jenjira
volunteers at. “We have a new son?” Richard asks, amused. “Yes, he was a
soldier. You’re a foreigner, you wouldn’t understand”, she informs him. He
insists that he does – but I’m not sure he really does.
I
highlight this exchange, because I think to a certain extent, it describes the
movie as well. Whenever I watch one of Weerasethakul’s film, I am always aware
there is a level of political allegory going on beneath the surface of the film
that I never fully understand. Weerasethakul is a Thai filmmaker, and even if
his movies don’t make a ton of money at home, he is making them for a Thai
audience, who is going to understand them in a different way than I, as an
outsider, will. And yet, it is because Weerasethakul’s films are so specific
that the emotions they conjure up are universal. When a film tries to dodge the
specifics – like say, Beasts of No Nation, which took place in an unnamed
African country, and danced around the root of the conflict – it starts to feel
at least slightly false. I may not understand the exact political climate in
Thailand that Weerasethakul is commenting on in his films – but on a more human
level, the films work.
As
with Weerasethakul’s other films, the past haunts the present in Cemetery of
Splendour. The main story takes place at a rural school that has been
transformed into a hospital. An old classroom, has been turned into a warding
for the sleeping soldiers, whose families loyally visit them, although they
mostly remain unconscious. What caused the soldiers to fall asleep in the first
place is never explained, although it explained that the school was built on
the “Cemetery of Kings”, and these long dead man are using the unconscious men
to continue to fight their war for them, sapping their energy, and keeping them
that way. Each man is hooked up to a glowing machine – the Americans apparently
used these in Afghanistan as well – that is supposed to regulate their dreams. It
is here where Jenjira meets Itt – he has no family to visit him, so she is the
one who keeps vigil. Occasionally, Itt wakes up, and he and Jenjira hit the
town – they go out for noodles, or to the movies. But he could fall asleep
again at any minute. There is a physic, Keng (Jarinpattra Rueangram), a young
woman who can communicate with the dead – or in this case, the unconscious. The
most memorable sequence of the movie is when Keng and Jenjira walk around the
grounds outside of the hospital. Keng has been taken over by Itt for this
sequence, and he/she describes the ornate palace of the King that he sees, as
Jenjira (and us, in the audience), she the normal forest all around us.
Weerasethakul
is a very deliberate filmmaker – which is a nice way of saying that his films
are often slow. Even compared to the likes of Syndromes and a Century and Uncle
Boonme Who Can Recall His Past Lives, Cemetery of Splendour is languidly paced.
Those two films have a lot in common with this one – Syndromes was also set at
a hospital, and Weerasethakul repeats some of the imagery of that film
(although not the literal inner workings of the hospital building he had
there). I think near the end, Weerasethakul is even playing with the audience a
little – making us think he’s going to end the film the way he did that time –
before circling around and ending the film with a rare close-up – which is all
the more stunning because it is so rare. With Uncle Boonme, it shares the
matter of fact presentation of the supernatural – ghosts are taken as a given
in these films, not horror movie stuff, but something more quiet and powerful.
Weerasethakul
is a one of a kind filmmaker – marching to the beat of his own drummer. His
camera rarely moves, and he prefers long takes – sometimes they stretch on for
minutes on end. His films also defy easy interpretation. He doesn’t do the work
for the audience – but he allows them to figure it all out for themselves. Some
of Cemetery of Splendour baffles me, some of it delights me, some of it haunts
me, and yes, some of it bores me. I think it’s fair to say that Cemetery of
Splendour is a more interesting film to write and talk about than it is to
actually watch. It certainly is a film that I’m glad I saw, and will not soon
forget – even if it doesn’t quite reach the heights of some of Weerasethakul’s
previous films.
No comments:
Post a Comment