I
am going to do two posts covering Hertzfeldt’s career – the first covers
1995-2005, and the second 2006-2015. Let’s get started.
Ah, L'Amour (1995)
Hertzfeldt’s
first student film shows that he pretty much already has his style in place –
even if it’s a lot cruder here than it would go on to be. The short runs about
two minutes, and features a happy-go-lucky stick figure man walking down the
street with a huge smile on his face – and running into a series of women. Each
time he meets one, he says something fairly innocuous (and it gives even more
innocent with each woman he meets) – before the woman freaks out, turns into
some sort of raging, violent psychopath and kills him in some sort of grotesque
way – decapitation, skinned alive, chainsaw, gun shot, stabbing, etc. – before
the kicker, when he finally gets a girl. The animation here is cruder than it
will be on any of Hertzfeldt’s other films (and I don’t think the print online
is the best) – but we can already see Hertzfeldt’s visual style – the stick
figures, the crumpled paper, etc – coming through, as well as his dark comic
sensibility, as the man is killed is surreal, grotesque ways. The actual
content of the film is, admittedly, more than a little off-putting – you can
almost see the film being used by some sort of Men’s Rights Activists, and
other misogynists (it certainly doesn’t help that the main character talks to
every women he meets – except for the fat one), but taken for what it is – a
little film made by an (admittedly) bitter student (the credits bill it as A
Bitter Film by Don Hertzfeldt – Bitter Films would later be what Hertzfeldt
called his company) and it’s an amusing little film. It is the least of
Hertzfeldt’s work – by a fair margin – but it’s amusing.
Genre (1996)
Hertzfeldt’s
second student film, Genre, is a big step up from Ah, L’Amour – the animation
is better, the humor better, and on the whole, it’s just a wonderful, little 5
minute film. In the film, an animator (on assumes Hertzfeldt), draws a cartoon
bunny (a little more advanced that Hertzfeldt’s stick figures – but not much),
and then pokes and prods him, angering the bunny, as he figures out what to do
with his creation. What he ends up doing is putting the bunny into 12
different, increasing bizarre movie genres – cycling through the standards –
Romance, Sci-Fi, Comedy, Horror, Porno, Children’s, and then being increasingly
strange – like the Abstract Foreign Western, before the bunny has the kicker –
a suggestion of his own genre. Once again, Hertzfeldt’s penchant for black
comedy is seen throughout – the poor bunny dies any number of times during this
5 minute film, often in bloody and hilarious ways. There’s really no use
denying that the film is one of Hertzfeldt’s lesser efforts – there’s no real
depth here, it’s just an amusing way to spend five minutes – but in that, it is
damn fun. For a student film, it’s excellent.
Lily and Jim (1997)
Of
Hertzfeldt’s four student films, Lily and Jim is easily the most ambitious of
the bunch – at 12 minutes, it’s longer than his first two combined, and is
really when he starts to explore his bittersweet themes that run through his
work. The two title characters are lonely, 20-somethings both looking for a
relationship – who end up on a disastrous blind date together. The film cuts
back and forth between the date – where the pair of them struggle through a
dinner, trying to come up with something to say to each other (often, allowing
us to hear their inner monologue, and then the horrible results of what they
actually say out loud), and the pair of them talking, directly to the camera
about how things went. The film perfectly captures that awkward, getting to
know each other – especially given how painfully shy both of these people are.
The dinner is awkward and mostly silent – the after dinner part, when they go
back to Lily’s place for coffee, is even worse (Jim is allergic to coffee, but
is too embarrassed to say so) even better. The film is quietly quite funny, but
also rather insightful in a way that sneaks up on you – Jim’s closing monologue
on the nature of relationships is quite touching and honest. Visually, the film
finds Hertzfeldt finding his groove – once again, they are mainly stick
figures, with only a dash of color. This is more down to earth than much of
Hertzfeldt (the only surreal part may be the inane images on the TV). The first
two student films are quite funny, but shallow – Lily and Jim is when
Hertzfeldt starting becoming the filmmaker he would go on to become.
Billy's Balloon (1998)
Hertzfeldt’s
final student film is this sadistic little marvel. As a parent of two kids
under 4, I can tell you there are few things they like more than balloons – and
Hertzfeldt’s short starts out with a little kid, a rattle in one hand, and red
balloon (a reference to, of course, the 1956 film The Red Balloon – a beloved
childhood short), basically as happy as can be. And then, the balloon attacks –
pummeling poor Billy into submission – and that’s just the beginning. At first,
it seems like Billy’s Balloon will be a one joke film – like Ah, L’Amour or
Genre – but Hertzfeldt keeps upping the stakes every minute or so (in this 5
minute film) – I particularly love who the balloon stops attacking when adults
walk by, and then tries, and succeeds, to win Billy’s affection back – before
it ups the ante once again. The film represents kind of a 180 from Lily and
Jim, which was more grounded then anything Hertzfeldt had done before – and
this one flies off into nasty, surreal, sadistic territory – and it’s also
hilarious. A wonderful little gem.
Rejected
(2000)
Hertzfeldt
received his first Oscar nomination for his first, non-student film – the
absolutely brilliant, hilarious, surreal, demented little masterwork –
Rejected, which works brilliantly on its own, and also works as a precise
summation of Hertzfeldt’s view on advertising – and why he doesn’t do it
himself. The concept of the film is simple – Hertzfeldt is hired to do a series
of commercials for “The Family Learning Channel”, and eventually for its parent
company – one of those all-encompassing corporate giants who make everything.
All of Hertzfeldt’s commercials get rejected, and they become increasingly
demented as the go along – not that they even start out normal.
The
first commercial has a stick figure (of course) holding a giant spoon in front
of a small cereal bowl repeatedly exclaiming “My spoon is too big” – before
he’s joined by a banana, who helpfully tells us that “I’m a banana”. Things get
increasingly bizarre from there – men growing a second head, flying pig fish, a
group of people with silly hats, a group of people in silly hats beating
someone wearing a regular hat, a bunny with angry ticks company out of his
nipples, stick figures spilling blood all over each other. Things get worse
when he has to start selling products – as his bizarre, disturbing commercials
have nothing to do with the products. All of this culminates in one of the most
bizarre, surreal, disturbing things I have ever seen – a group of, I don’t
know, fluff balls, who are dancing around as their leader exclaims things like
“Life is Good”, “This is Fun” and finally “My anus is bleeding” – all to their
cheers. In his text commentary, Hertzfeldt says that an academic once compared
this to Nazi propaganda films – and while I’m not sure about the Nazi part, the
propaganda is certainly accurate. This isn’t even the end of the 9 minute film
– as Hertzfeldt first tries doing a commercial with his left hand, and then, in
a complete psychological meltdown, the commercials literally start falling
apart, the pages start crumbling, and everything is sucked into a black hole.
On
one level, Rejected is just a straight ahead comic masterwork – hilarious in
its bizarre, surreal nightmare inducing commercial landscape. But it also acts
as Hertzfeldt’s mission statement – he clearly has the talent that he could
make a lot of money doing commercials if he wanted to – but they wouldn’t be
his work. So, instead, we get a bizarre little masterwork like Rejected – which
is 9 minutes of utterly bizarre brilliance.
The Animation Show:
Welcome to the Show/Intermission in the Third Dimension/The End of the Show
(2003)
In
2003, Hertzfeldt teamed up with Mike Judge to present The Animation Show – a
touring collection of animated shorts that went theatrical, and then to DVD. As
part of this presentation, Hertzfeldt did three mini-segments – Welcome to the
Show for the beginning, Intermission in the Third Dimension, somewhere in the
middle, and The End of the Show, predictably, at the end. No one would have
blame Hertzfeldt for merely phoning it in with this segments – that run a total
of 8 minutes – but Hertzfeldt, predictably, didn’t do that – and actually does
some fairly brilliant stuff here.
In
the Welcome to the Show segment, it starts out pretty much how you would expect
it to – with the Fluffy guys from Rejected coming back to welcome the audience
to the show, implore them to visit the lobby for some snacks, etc. Then one of
the fluffy guys asks the other one what Animation is, and all hell breaks
loose, as he explains that anything is possible in animation, and to prove it,
Hertzfeldt starts screwing with both of them – giving them extra arms, giving
them longer legs, and basically torturing them, giving rise to one of my
favorite quotes of all of Hertzfeldt’s work – “Damn the illusion of movement”.
The segment has a mind of its own, and tries to go back to being a bright,
cheery commercial (“Let’s all go to the lobby”, etc) – but what has already
been unleashed cannot be stopped.
The
even stranger Intermission in the Third Dimension is funnier and more surreal
than the Welcome to the Show segment – and probably plays even better today
than in 2003, since the film industry has embraced 3-D to an extreme degree.
The two fluffy guys are back for an Intermission in the Third Dimension, before
admitting that 3-D glasses are not available in all areas, but acting like
everything we see will be in 3-D. When one of them puts on the 3-D glasses, his
mind his blown – and he falls down an acid fuelled rabbit hole, full of bizarre
imagery, before he is attacked by spiders.
The
finale brings back our two lovable fluff balls, and one starts to make an
impassioned plea about the value of animation – how it’s not just for children
and people with mental handicaps, but a genuine art form for all – but is
interrupted by robots, who the fluff balls immediately have to get into a loud,
incoherent battle with, bringing our show to an end. It’s like a mini-version
of Adaptation.
By
their very nature, these three mini-shorts are not as deep as much of Hertzfeldt’s
work – but I do think they act as an extension of Rejected in many ways – as it
allows Hertzfeldt more a chance to explore just what is possible in animation,
and try to explain why he loves it – and how it has been overtaken by
commercial concerns – and wrapped up in a surreal, brilliant little package.
Many people would have simply tossed something off quickly for these segments –
but Hertzfeldt does something quite clever with them. They probably deserve
more attention than they get.
The Meaning of Life
(2005)
The
Meaning of Life strikes me as a film where Hertzfeldt is clearly growing –
stretching what he can do in terms of animation, while maintaining his visual
style, he adds different elements to it. It’s also the most wildly ambitious
film that Hertzfeldt has ever made – essentially encompassing all of human
evolution from the beginning until way into the future into one, 12 minute
films is daunting. But the film is up to the task – and fully earns comparisons
to such films as Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) and Terence
Malick’s The Tree of Life (2011).
The
film opens with a haunting image of a stick figure in light, falling and
falling, before he turns to ash. Hertzfeldt then gives us millions of years of
human evolution in the span of a minute, culminating with modern man – under
storm clouds – as a series of stick figures walk across the screen, all
repeating a single phrase over and over again – soon, there are more and more
people, and things gets dark, and more violent – the screen is soon full of
people, and Hertzfeldt then scrolls through human history, sometimes stopping
on a group of dead people, and then scrolling further. Then in his boldest
gamut, he takes us briefly into the cosmos, before returning to earth and
showing human kind’s continued evolution – as we morph from one strange
creature to the next, we never seem to learn anything, as each creature repeats
our mistakes. Soon, we are left with but two characters – and a father and a
son perhaps – who discuss the meaning of life – the father angry that the son
would even ask, before he stalks away – leaving the son by himself with the
stars – which brings a smile to his face. Soon, we are back into those stars.
It’s
nearly impossible to describe The Meaning of Life – not the visuals, as while
it does look like many of Hertzfeldt’s stuff, it also introduces the most
ambitious visuals his films had seen to this point – the cosmos, who he tints
the screen, near the end. But the overwhelming effect the film has on the
viewer. It’s an abstract piece to be sure- perhaps the most daring one of
Hertzfeldt’s career. It’s a film that forces you to reckon with it more than
anything else he has done. In short, it is a masterpiece – the best film he had
done to this point.
That’s
the end of Part I of my look back at Don Hertzfeldt. The eight films (or
whatever) here show a director on the rise – the early promise of his student
shorts, the culmination of his humorous pieces with Rejected, and his ambitious
The Meaning of Life to bring to an end his first decade. Next time, we’ll look
at how Hertzfeldt has continued to evolve in the last decade.
No comments:
Post a Comment