Directed by: Penny Lane.

It’s
true that the Super 8 footage seen in Our Nixon has never been seen before – it
was confiscated as part of the Watergate investigation, and been kept under
lock and key ever since. Haldeman, Ehrlichman and Chapin seem to have been
three of those people who document everything they do – and so we do see
footage of Nixon that the media would never have gotten. The problem with the
movie is simple – the footage isn’t all that enlightening. By itself, it
doesn’t really show you much of anything about Nixon that you didn’t already
know. And the movie relies heavily on previously recorded interviews with the
participants, and old news reports, and portions of Nixon’s “secret” White
House tapes to tell the story. And the story is the same one that has been told
about Nixon for years now – how his pettiness and ego got in his way – it was
his ego and drive that got him to the highest office in the land – and also
forced him to resign from it.
I’m
not sure who the target audience for Our Nixon really is. I’m hardly a Nixon
expert, but still, I didn’t find anything in the movie to be all that
enlightening or new that I didn’t already know about Nixon. If you’re surprised
how he talks about Daniel Ellsburg, the Washington Post or “fags”, than you
probably don’t know much about Nixon in the first place. And if that’s the
case, I’m not sure Our Nixon would be the place to start. The film seems to
rely on at least some prior knowledge of Nixon and Watergate in order to
function.
In
short, I think the problem with the film is that director Penny Lane found
there wasn’t much of interest in the released footage, and tried to string a
narrative out of it anyway. Our Nixon isn’t a bad film – it held my interest –
it’s just that some old home movies from some of Nixon’s advisers doesn’t seem
like enough of a reason to be to make a documentary.
Note: I saw the film during
one of it’s Broadcasts on CNN in early August ahead of its theatrical release
at the end of the month. This wasn’t the best way to see the film – which is
only 84 minutes, but was slotted in a 2 hour time slot – meaning that CNN seemed
to take extended commercial breaks every 10 minutes or so, which undeniably
altered the flow of the film. I stand by my review, which I didn’t find all
that enlightening, but fully admit that I may have liked it more had it been
allowed to play at a more natural pace.
No comments:
Post a Comment