Mary Magdalene *** / *****
Directed by: Garth
Davis.
Written by: Helen
Edmundson and Philippa Goslett.
Starring: Rooney Mara (Mary
Magdalene), Joaquin Phoenix (Jesus), Chiwetel Ejiofor (Peter), Tahar Rahim
(Judas), Ariane Labed (Rachel), Denis Menochet (Daniel), Lubna Azabal
(Susannah), Tcheky Karyo (Elisha), Charles Babalola (Andrew), Tawfeek Barhim
(James), Ryan Corr (Joseph), Uri Gavriel (Philip), Shira Haas (Leah), Tsahi
Halevi (Ephraim), Irit Sheleg (Mother Mary).
The
obvious goal of Garth Davis’ Mary Magdalene is to try and rehabilitate the
reputation of its title character – who is still seen by most as a prostitute
friend of Jesus, even though she was never a prostitute, and was really more of
an apostle – the equal of any of the other apostles, and perhaps even more than
that if the P.O.V. of this movie is to be believed – perhaps the only apostle
who truly understood Jesus’ message. The goal of rehab is a worthy one, and the
other message is one that I think thoughtful Christians should at least
consider – which of course means the film won’t get seen by those who prefer
the Christian movies like God’s Not Dead, which don’t seek to challenge or even
provoke thought, but simply to congratulate you on your views. It would be
easier to recommend the film Mary Magdalene though if, as a film, it had a
little more life to it. This is a slow (too slow) movie, and for big chunks of
it, the film seems to be basically be Jesus’ greatest hits – just with slightly
more emphasis on Mary Magdalene’s reaction to them than normal. It’s the type
of film that is probably more interesting to discuss than it is to actually
watch.
We only
get about 20 minutes or so of a pre-Jesus Mary Magdalene (Rooney Mara). Mary is
probably too quiet, too spiritual, too much a rebel for her small fishing town.
She is beloved by her father, who indulges her, but her brother is getting
tired of her ways – he wants her to get married, and get on with what women are
here to do – churn out babies, and raise them. But Mary doesn’t want that – so
when the mysterious teacher, (Joaquin Phoenix) and his apostles, come to their
town – she is immediately drawn to him – and when they leave, she decides she
must go as well. Really only two other Apostles come into focus in the film –
Peter (Chiwetel Ejiofor) is suspicious of Mary – he thinks no good will come of
having a woman with them, but Judas (Tahar Rahim) is more welcoming.
The roles
are well cast. Mary Magdalene does a lot of meaningful looking in this film –
as she takes in Jesus, and his deeds, and churns them over in her head. And
Rooney Mara, if nothing else, is great at this kind of acting – think of how
great she is, while seemingly doing so little in films like Carol and A Ghost
Story – where she conveys a lot just in the way she looks. If there is a
problem here, it’s that Mary isn’t that complex a character – and most her
looks convey the same thing. Phoenix is a good choice to play Jesus – he is
more tortured here then we often see him – physically, mentally and spiritually
in pain with the weight pushed upon him. Mary offers him comfort – but also challenges
him – pushes him to talk directly to women, etc. Peter and Judas are the only
other characters who get much to do here – and what’s interesting is that they
really are portrayed as flip sides to the same coin – both may have gotten into
this for the wrong reasons, selfish reasons – although what it leads to them to
do is obviously much different.
The film
was directed by Garth Davis with restraint – way too much restraint really. The
film is quiet and thoughtful – but what it really lacks is some sort of life to
it – something to really sink your teeth into. As the film falls into the trap
of showing the same things Jesus always does – whether it’s bring Lazarus back
from the dead, or getting angry at the marketplace in the temple, you start to
realize you’re seeing what you’ve always seen – just with more muted emotions.
None of the people in the film feel like flesh and blood people – and Jesus
doesn’t really feel like God either. Everything about the film is just too
muted for its own good.
Which
isn’t to say the movie is bad. It certainly does give you a lot to think about
– a lot to chew on. But it doesn’t quite give you enough to keep you involved –
to keep your mind from wandering – as you watch the film. To be fair, your mind
often wanders to the questions the film may want you to ask – but it takes you
out of the film as you watch it. It is an admirable thing to try to take the
story and turn it on its head – it just doesn’t do that enough to make you want
to seek out this specific version of the story you know so well.
No comments:
Post a Comment