Directed by: Oliver Stone.
Written by: Stanley Weiser & Oliver Stone.
Starring: Charlie Sheen (Bud Fox), Michael Douglas (Gordon Gekko), Daryl Hannah (Darien Taylor), Martin Sheen (Carl Fox), Hal Holbrook (Lou Mannheim), John C. McGinley (Marvin), Terence Stamp (Sir Larry Wildman), Sean Young (Kate Gekko), James Spader (Roger Barnes), James Karen (Lynch), Sylvia Miles (Dolores the Realtor).
Wall
Street is perhaps the quintessential 1980s movie. Not the best movie of the
decade – nor even one of the best – but a film that if you want to know what prestige,
adult dramas looked like during that decade, you would pretty much get the
complete picture by watching it. It is a flashy, stylistic film – complete with
montages playing over a drum machine based score, men in flashy suits, with big
hair, and women in dresses with huge shoulder pads, and even bigger hair. As a
director, Oliver Stone seemed willing to embrace all trends of the time in
terms of filmmaking, to make his film seem cutting edge – which, of course, is
a surefire sign that the movie will end up aging poorly – which in some ways,
Wall Street certainly has. It is very much a movie of its time and place – a
portrait of Reagan era excess, meant by Stone to be an outraged howl against
it. That the film ended up inspiring a new age of Wall Street men who wanted to
be Gordon Gekko is one of the most ironic things about the movie.
The
film stars Charlie Sheen as Bud Fox – who works at one of the lowest levels of
Wall Street – a broker, sure, but one who has to survive making cold calls to
the “little fish”. He wants to be a whale – and sets his sights on the biggest
one he can find – Michael Douglas’ Gordon Gekko. After months of trying, Bud
finally gets a meeting with Gekko – but the older man remains unimpressed with
Bud and his information – that is, until he gives Gekko a piece of information
that no one else knows, about the airline where Bud’s father works. That’s a
good tip – and Gekko wants more from Bud. He doesn’t need more analysts pouring
over information – he needs someone who is willing to go out there and get the
information by whatever means necessary – and Bud is willing to do that. Bud
knows what he’s doing isn’t strictly legal – but hey, everyone’s doing it. Soon
Bud is sucked into Gekko’s world of big money, and fast women – like Darien
(Daryl Hannah), an interior designer who is willing to be with Bud, as long as
the money keeps coming in. And Bud is willing to do what it takes to keep it
that way.
Stone
means Wall Street to be a wake-up call to the unmitigated greed that he saw
taking over the country during the go-go 1980s – and he mainly succeeds. Gekko
is a person who is willing to do anything to make money – he doesn’t much care
if people are hurt by his actions, he doesn’t create anything – he simply does
his best to move money from someone else’s pocket to his own. And yet, Stone
also created a movie where it is possible to root for Gekko from the get-go,
even knowing he’s a greedy asshole. As played by Douglas, who won a deserved
Oscar for the role, Gekko is the smartest, most charming guy in the movie. His
infamous “Greed is Good” speech – which is probably the scene that won him that
Oscar – is a brilliant distillation of the greed of Wall Street, and of
“trickle down” economics, that should leave audiences shocked by the greed.
Except for the fact that Douglas delivers it with so much conviction, that you wind
up almost believing it yourself, unless you’re actually listening to it. Gekko
is so much more charming that anyone in the movie – certainly more so that
Martin Sheen, as Bud’s father, who is supposed to be the working collar,
honest, hardworking counterpoint to Gekko’s greed in the film. But damn it, he
also seems like such a stick in the mud – a downer, always lecturing his son.
No wonder he goes for Gekko’s line of bullshit with little prompting – it’s so
much more fun. For an entire generation, Gekko represents everything that is
wrong with Wall Street and greed – unless, of course, you’re one of the many
people who decided they wanted to be Gordon
Gekko themselves. In another movie – Boiler Room (2000) – the young brokers
quote Gekko like he is their God – because in many ways, he is.
Does
this make Wall Street a success, or a failure? Wall Street is certainly a
“message” movie, and the message comes in loud and clear to many – and is
completely inverted for just as many. If Stone can be faulted for anything in
Wall Street it’s that he made a film that is perhaps too much fun. Martin
Scorsese’s The Wolf of Wall Street (2013) was accused by many of glamorizing its
real life Wall Street crooks for much the same reason – the movie is a hell of
a lot of fun. Then again, if you cannot see the serious critique of Wall Street
greed in both of these films just because they’re entertaining – that’s more on
you than the movies themselves. Wall Street is a slick movie – a traditional
rise and fall story for Bud Fox, as he starts from the bottom, comes all the
way, and then comes crashing down at the end. The rise has got to be fun, or
else it wouldn’t make much sense.
Wall
Street does have its share of problems, of course. The ending always rings
false to me – as if Bud would suddenly find his conscience again in the blink
of an eye, and then do what he does. The fact that the film has a traditional
ending – where the evil are punished – actually undercuts the movie’s power a
little bit – as it would have been far more honest had everyone gotten away
with everything, as that is what seems to happen in real life way more often
than not. As mentioned before, Martin Sheen doesn’t quite often the
counterpunch to Douglas that I think the movie requires him to – it’s not much
Sheen’s fault, he didn’t write his dialogue which basically consists of moral
grandstanding speeches. And, as has become common in this series on Stone
movies, Wall Street certainly has a woman problem. I think The Wolf of Wall
Street does a far better job at showing women are used, abused and tossed aside
but the alpha male characters on Wall Street than this movie does, which
basically doesn’t bother to present them at all. The only significant female
character is Daryl Hannah – who is given almost nothing to do, and looks
completely and totally bored the entire time she is doing it. It would have
been far better had Stone did what he did with Platoon – and present Wall
Street as an all-male world – that at least would have been a quiet commentary
on the misogyny of Wall Street where woman are still vastly under represented.
Still,
Wall Street is a very good movie. It is one of Stone’s best remembered, and
still iconic movies (it’s hard to imagine him being given the money to make a
sequel to any of his other films more than two decades later). It isn’t one of
his best – it’s a little simplistic to me, perhaps too much style over
substance, and too much speechifying to make it as good as it could have been
(like The Wolf of Wall Street is – that’s a masterpiece on the same subject).
Still, I have seen Wall Street at least five or six times over the years, and
it never fails to draw me back in once again. Is the movie too entertaining for
its own good? Perhaps – but that’s preferable to the alternative.
No comments:
Post a Comment