Directed by: Hossein Amini.
Written by: Hossein Amini based on the novel by Patricia Highsmith.
Starring: Viggo Mortensen (Chester MacFarland), Oscar Isaac (Rydal), Kirsten Dunst (Colette MacFarland), Daisy Bevan (Lauren), David Warshofsky (Paul Vittorio), Yigit Ă–zsener (Yahya).
The
Two Faces of January plays like a classic Hollywood thriller – and I mean that
in the best way possible. The film is based on a Patricia Highsmith novel, and
takes place in 1962 – and I think it’s safe to say that this is a film that
very well could have made at that time. It is made with skill and precision by
writer-director Hossein Amini – and contains two excellent performances by
Viggo Mortenson and Oscar Isaac. It does precisely what it sets out to do – and
if it isn’t the most ambitious film in the world, that’s okay because it works
very well on its own terms.
The
film opens in Greece, where an American couple – Chester and Colette MacFarland
(Mortenson and Kirsten Dunst) are on vacation. They have a lot of money –
Chester works in investments, and is apparently very good at his job. The spot
another American – Rydal (Isaac) who works as a tour guide – mainly targeting attractive,
young, female tourists, who he charms, and then takes advantage of – scamming them
out of a few dollars here and there. We immediately suspect that he will set
his sights on the MacFarlands, and try and take advantage of them. But the
movie doesn’t play out quite like that – Rydal isn’t quite the scam artist we
think he is, and Chester isn’t the innocent American business man we think he
is. Soon, the two men have to dispose of a body, and then the trio need to get
out of town. The two men circle each other – and we’re never quite sure if they
are allies or enemies – mainly because neither of them are so sure either – and
we’re never quite sure where Colette’s loyalties lie either.
The
film is beautiful to look at. In many ways, this is a film noir – but it’s one
when much of the action takes place in the sun drenched, beautiful countryside
in Greece – not in the dark, shadowy back corners like many noirs do. It is
every inch a Highsmith story – who’s most famous creation was Tom Ripley – a charming,
cultured sociopath and serial killer, who motives are always murky. That
describes Chester, and perhaps to a lesser extent Rydal as well.
Mortenson
has always excelled at playing characters like Chester – those who appear to be
one thing, but whose charming surface masks so much more darkness (or
sometimes, vice versa). He would have excelled as a studio player back in the
day, because he’s able to do so much by doing so little. Isaac matches him as
Rydal – or nearly does anyway, his character isn’t as well defined – and in
many ways resembles a younger version of Chester – which is precisely why
Chester doesn’t trust him – he knows who he is. The flaw in the movie is that
Dunst doesn’t get much of a character play – she’s just another part of the
beautiful backdrop that the main action plays out on. She does what is required
of her, but in a movie where the motives of the two men remain murky because
they are complicated, her motivations remain murky, and it’s more likely
because her character is underwritten.
This
is the first film as a director by Amini – who has been working as a
screenwriter for years now. He made a good choice of material for a first time
directing effort. The film is clean, cold, calculating - and most importantly doesn’t
try to be anything greater than what it is. Many first time directors try to do
too much – Amini keeps The Two Faces of January humming on its rather modest
scale.
That
is what holds The Two Faces of January back from being a great film – it is
little more than its charming, beautiful surface. There is no deeper meaning
here. So the achievement of The Two Faces of January is rather modest – but it’s
still an achievement. There is nothing wrong with making a pitch perfect, old
school genre film – and that is what The Two Faces of January is.
No comments:
Post a Comment