The
Sisters Brothers *** ½ / *****
Directed
by: Jacques
Audiard.
Written
by: Jacques
Audiard and Thomas Bidegain based on the novel by Patrick DeWitt.
Starring:
John
C. Reilly (Eli Sisters), Joaquin Phoenix (Charlie Sisters), Jake Gyllenhaal
(John Morris), Riz Ahmed (Hermann Kermit Warm), Rebecca Root (Mayfield),
Allison Tolman (Girl Mayfield Saloon), Rutger Hauer (The Commodore), Carol Kane
(Mrs. Sisters).
Jacques Audiard’s chose the
Western genre to make his English language debut with The Sisters Brothers – an
odd film, that lays somewhere between a loving homage to the genre, and a
revisionist Western, with modern sensibilities – Audiard and company never
quite settle on which. As such, the film does feel kind of shaggy at times,
rambling along at its own pace like an Altman Western, and at times, wants to
be something tougher and more violent like a Peckinpah Western. I don’t know
that the mixture always works, and yet the movie remains entertaining and
involving until the end – although its pleasures are more fleeting that much of
Audiard’s previous work.
The film takes place in Oregon
and then California during Gold Rush times. The title characters are Eli and
Charlie Sisters (John C. Reilly and Joaquin Phoenix), a pair of skilled hitmen,
who do the dirty work of The Commodore (Rutger Hauer), mostly without question.
They are getting older though, and Eli is starting to look at life after the
killing is done – settling down, getting married, etc. Charlie, who never looks
beyond the next kill, the next drink, the next whorehouse, is precisely the
opposite. He’s going to keep killing forever. Their latest job has them on the
trail of Herman Kermit Warm (Riz Ahmed), a chemist who was passing through
their town, and apparently let slip to The Commodore his latest chemical
formula – something he says will light up all the gold in the water, making the
usual difficult work of panning for gold simple. The Commodore has already sent
John Morris (Jake Gyllenhaal) to track Warm, and keep his eyes on him until the
Sisters get there – but the brother start to suspect that Morris and has
actually teamed up with Warm, as they never seem to be able to keep pace.
The movie then is split up
between these two odd pairs – with a lot more time with the Sisters, then the
other two, but everyone getting their due. Reilly and Phoenix have a natural,
relaxed chemistry together, and gradually we get to know them – and their
backstory more. This is probably where The Sisters Brothers most resembles
Audiard’s other films – in examining the past of his characters, to find what
led them to violence in the first place – not to mention the slow buildup and
the brutal explosion of violence in the first place. Reilly is really the star
here – and the most complex character – a man capable of tremendous violence,
but also vulnerability and sensitivity. He wants out – but he needs his brother
to want out as well. Phoenix is fine in his role as well – it’s just a little
more clichéd a role, the drunken psycho, although that doesn’t give his
character credit for his depth either.
Because so much time is spent
with them, and they are given more depth, Gyllenhaal and Ahmed have less to
work with in their scenes. Gyllenhaal adopts a sort of British accent for some
reason (and, miraculously, it works) and Ahmed uses his natural charm to great
advantage here. Is he a con man, or not – you can never be quite sure.
Ultimately, The Sisters Brothers
I don’t think ever quite reaches what it is aiming for. It wants to be an
example of the genre, and a modern take on it, and yet never quite commits to
either. It’s fascinating to watch, and gets quote emotional at points –
watching as the Brothers care for each other, as each will have to save the
other in some way shape or form. I just think that perhaps the film could have
been better had it committed to either being more a classic, throwback Western,
or something more comedic and surreal. It doesn’t commit to either, and as
such, is stuck in between.
No comments:
Post a Comment