Madeline's
Madeline **** ½ / *****
Directed
by: Josephine
Decker.
Written
by: Josephine
Decker and Donna di Novelli.
Starring:
Helena
Howard (Madeline), Miranda July (Regina), Molly Parker (Evangeline), Okwui
Okpokwasili (Nurse, KK), Sunita Mani (Assistant Max), Felipe Bonilla (Santos,
Cousin Elmer), Lisa Tharps (Laura), Curtiss Cook (George), Reynaldo Piniella (Jaime),
Myra Lucretia Taylor (Kaila).
I watched both of director
Josephine Decker’s first two films back-to-back when they were released on
Fandor back in 2014 – Butter on the Latch and Thou Wast Lovely and Mild – and
thought that while both of them were flawed, they showed real talent –
particularly in their form, more than their narrative. Decker’s strange
shooting style, and intuitive editing, were fascinating, as was her sense of
place. But neither film was all that good on a narrative level – they were
better at building mood, than telling a story, or exploring its characters. In
her follow-up, Madeline’s Madeline, all those problems are gone – and what
we’re left with is a stunning film – a coming of age drama about a teenage
girl, torn between two mother figures, which blends fact and fiction, and
questions the ethics of doing just that, as it proceeds down the line. It will,
undoubtedly, be a frustrating film for some viewers – those who want a clearly
narrative, more answers, and more traditional storytelling. But if you go along
with the film, it’s quietly stunning – especially when it gets to the end of
the film.
Madeline (Helena Howard, giving a
remarkable debut performance) is a 16-year-old girl living in New York with her
mother, Regina (Miranda July) and her brother. She is the youngest member of an
experimental theater group, run by Evangeline (Molly Parker) – who is working
on a new work – although it seems to change from rehearsal to rehearsal as to
what it is about. While the two older women are rarely in the same place
together with Madeline, they are both clearly struggling for some kind of
control over her – wanting Madeline to be a certain way. Neither of them are
probably good for her, and I’m not even sure a combination will work. There is
talk about Madeline’s health – mainly in the background, mentions of being
institutionalized. Madeline is also clearly bi-racial – but her (presumably)
black father is nowhere to be seen, although he has left behind all his stuff
in a basement. It’s telling that the two women wrestling for control over
Madeline are both white – and how Madeline’s own race is barely mentioned. It’s
still pivotal to the movie, whether it’s talked about or not.
The performances in the movie are
remarkable – which is even more amazing when you think of the style of the
movie, and how the actresses had to work. This is a world that Miranda July
knows well – one of performance art, and indie films – and she is excellent as
the nervous, over-protective mother, who while she is understandably worried
for her daughter, also is helping her very much by treating her like a child.
It’s easy to see why Madeline is initially so taken with Evangeline – who is a
freeing influence, someone who wants Madeline to express her, to show everyone
who she is. But as the movie moves along, it’s becomes increasingly clear that
Evangeline is exploiting Madeline – the work the group is doing becomes more
and more about Madeline, her pain, her relationships, the violence inside her,
etc. At what point does collaboration turn into exploitation?
This is a key question, because
Decker herself worked very closely with Helena Howard on developing the movie.
She is, in a way, a version of Evangeline – albeit one who recognizes this
question, and questions it, which is something Evangeline does not do. Decker’s
process also allowed Howard to deliver the remarkable performance she does in
the film – as Madeline takes control of the narrative.
The style of Madeline’s Madeline
will alienate some people. The images are beautiful, but not in a traditional
way. The editing is ragged, and intuitive. All of it is designed to place us
inside Madeline’s head, even as the movie doesn’t attempt to fully explain her
– we get the sense of what it’s like to be her. It can be, admittedly,
maddeningly at times – and it takes a while to get on the films wavelength. And
yet, by the end, I was enthralled. When I saw Decker’s first two films, I could
see the talent there – I just didn’t quite think the movies were fully
realized. With Madeline’s Madeline, she truly does announce her as a massive
talent.
No comments:
Post a Comment