Showing posts with label Ruben Östlund. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ruben Östlund. Show all posts

Monday, November 13, 2017

Movie Review: The Square

The Square **** ½ / *****
Directed by: Ruben Östlund.
Written by: Ruben Östlund.
Starring: Claes Bang (Christian), Elisabeth Moss (Anne), Dominic West (Julian), Terry Notary (Oleg), Christopher Læssø (Michael).
 
If Jordan Peele’s Get Out had not have come out this year, than Ruben Östlund’s The Square would be the year’s most “uncomfortable” film to sit through – and I mean that in a good way. Östlund’s point is to make us uncomfortable, to have us question our own ethics and morals throughout the film, while at the same time, providing a ruthless – and funny – satire of the contemporary art world. Östlund knows, of course, that The Square is itself an “art film”, so he’s poking fun at himself – and everyone in the audience watching as well. I’m not sure he has any real answers to the questions he asks – nor does he want to – he just wants to prod you into thinking about them. You likely already know if this film sounds like it would appealing to you – and you’re almost definitely right about that. If you don’t want that sort of experience, The Square would be excruciating to sit through – especially since it rambles around for nearly two and half hours.
 
The film stars Claes Bang as Christian – the head curator at a Stockholm museum of Modern Art – the type of place where they have an exhibit that consists of piles of gravel on the floor and a neon sign proclaiming “You Have Nothing” – but helpful guards who will tell you you’re not allowed to take photos of it. The film opens with a scene in which a reporter – Anne (Elisabeth Moss) interviews Christian about the museum and its philosophy – particularly about a night in which they hosted a talked about the difference between Exhibit and Non-Exhibit – and what art “is”. Christian unhelpfully babbles on and on, without really saying anything in a way that many do when talking about Modern Art – after all, you don’t want to appear to be “pretentious” is discussing these lofty ideals, but you also don’t want appear to be stupid and “not get it” either. This sets up the Christian we will see for the rest of the movie – who time after time has reality interfere with his lofty ideals, as he gets himself into more and more trouble.
 
It all starts on the streets when he hears a woman calling out for help – but who he ignores, until he is pretty much forced to react, because he’s physically pulled into the conflict by another man, shielding the woman, from what we assume is an angry boyfriend. After it’s all over, the two men congratulate themselves on a job well done – neither one of them realizing the woman is gone, and Christian only realizing later that his wallet, cellphone and cufflinks have been stolen. Instead of just letting it go, Christian will end up tracking his phone to a large apartment building – and it’s there where he really makes a mistake, that will end up haunting him the rest of the movie, and getting him in deeper and deeper trouble.
 
The film is largely episodic, which each episode operating both as its own sort of moral quandary, comedic set piece, and interestingly, a part of the larger overall picture. There are things that are never explained – like Anne’s pet chimpanzee for instance, who Christian sees one night when he’s over there, and we feel like he’s about to ask Anne why she has a pet chimp – but then again, she’s clearly ready to have sex, and he’s not going to stop that (the sex scene itself is funny, awkward, unerotic, and completely honest – and is followed by an absurdly long conversation about the condom that was used).
 
Basically the movie is about a man who has lived his life largely compartmentalized – he places the different aspects in his life in different boxes you could say – and throughout the course of the film, those boxes start to be mixed together, and he cannot function. The title of the movie comes from an upcoming exhibit at the museum, which is a literal square where inside “We all share the same rights and obligations” – a utopian idea that we all know what work in practice. There is a brilliant sequence late in the film at the museum during a black tie dinner, where Oleg (Terry Notary) a performance artist comes in and blurs the line between man and animal – at first in amusing ways, and then gradually in ways that start to annoy, and perhaps even endanger people. The sequence is perhaps a microcosm of the whole movie – the social contract works because we all agree to it – but it can be violated so easily, and then what are you supposed to do (and if you don’t know, do you do anything).
 
All of this probably sounds like it’s more a thought experiment than a movie – and there is certainly a danger that could happen here. But it’s grounded by Bang’s remarkable performance as Christian – who somehow keeps his character relatable – even charming – throughout, even as he does worse and worse things (Moss has the key supporting role – and she helps as well). The movie is also just outright funny. The film won the Palme D’or at Cannes this year – an irony not lost on anyone, as this film that wants to puncture the airless art world wins the biggest prize at the most arty film festival there is. That only makes things more interesting – and perhaps, proves its point.

Monday, November 3, 2014

Movie Review: Force Majeure

Force Majeure
Directed by: Ruben Östlund.
Written by: Ruben Östlund.
Starring: Johannes Kuhnke (Tomas), Lisa Loven Kongsli (Ebba), Clara Wettergren (Vera), Vincent Wettergren (Harry), Kristofer Hivju (Mats), Fanni Metelius (Fanni).

We all like to think that we know what we would do in an emergency – especially when it comes to protecting our family. But the reality is no one really does know what they would do until they are actually faced with that situation. Ruben Ostlund’s brilliant dark comedy Force Majeure will likely rival Gone Girl for the movie that causes the most fights from couples after seeing the movie.

When the film starts, Tomas (Johanne Kuhnke) and Ebba (Lisa Loven Kongsli) seem like the perfect, upper class couple. The Swedish couple, along with their two perfect looking children, have travelled to an upscale ski resort in the French Alps. The movie opens with them one top of the mountain posing for a series of beautiful snapshots – when we see the pictures later, they almost look like the type that would come with the frame when you buy it. A little later, the family is seen sleeping on a large bed together – perfectly at rest and peaceful. Who wouldn’t want to be them?

Then, on the second day of their five day trip, something happens that throws their idyllic, unexamined life into chaos. While dining at a mountain restaurant, they witness a controlled avalanche, that comes roaring towards them – getting so close it looks like they are all about to be buried. Ebba screams for her husband, the children scream for daddy – and Tomas grabs his iPhone and runs for cover by himself. A few minutes later when it’s clear that there never was any danger, he comes back and the family act as if nothing happened. But something has ruptured in their relationship – and Ebba begins to obsess on it, the children start to worry about the state of their parents’ marriage, and Tomas tries to brush the whole thing off. Ostlund then introduces another couple – another middle aged man, this one divorced, and on vacation with his 20 year old girlfriend. The man is an old friend of Tomas’, and they argue long into the night after the centerpiece center of Force Majeure – where Ebba explains what happened, and how it made her feel. This other couple are almost audience surrogates – not because they are our way into the movie, but because like them, many audience members will argue about what they would do in the same situation.

Force Majeure plays almost like a slightly kinder, much funnier Michael Haneke film. Like in a Haneke film, Ostlund is punishing an upper class couple who when the movie begins are in blissful ignorance, and do very little examination of their own lives. But unlike Haneke, Ostlund doesn’t really hold them into contempt, but rather sees their wealth as just a way they have insolated themselves from reality – something they can no longer do once Tomas reveals that when the chips are down, he’ll rescue his iPhone, and leave his wife and kids to fend for themselves.

Force Majeure is about class – in a way – but it’s more about gender roles, and how both men and women struggle to live up to what they are “supposed” to do. Tomas denies his action for as long as he can – because he doesn’t really want to admit that he is a coward, that has now been clearly proven. He’s supposed to be manly and a protector – and he’s failed at that. And yet, he never truly regrets it either. We have other scenes where his masculinity is flattered, then shattered, and when he finally breaks down and asks for forgiveness, it’s not the redemption we are expecting – but simply makes him more pathetic. He isn’t really sorry – he’s playing the role of a man who is sorry.

And Ebba is equally fascinating as she tries, desperately, to cling to the idea of a life that she has – and lashes out at those around her that challenge it – a tense scene with a fellow middle aged, married mother who has an open relationship that angers Ebba for instance. When Tomas eventually does break down, she is the most resistant to forgive – their kids jump in immediately, but she has to be dragged.
 
Many movies would have ended on that scene – and to be fair, perhaps Force Majeure should have ended there as well. But this movie takes it a little farther than that – and has two set pieces that gives the film an appropriately ambiguous ending. In the film, this couple wants to come back together – and on the surface, they do just that. But something is broken between these two – and it’s not going to be that easy.