Showing posts with label Lucrecia Martel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lucrecia Martel. Show all posts

Monday, April 23, 2018

Movie Review: Zama

Zama **** / *****
Directed by: Lucrecia Martel.
Written by: Lucrecia Martel based on the novel by Antonio Di Benedetto.
Starring: Daniel Giménez Cacho (Don Diego de Zama), Lola Dueñas (Luciana Piñares de Luenga), Matheus Nachtergaele (Vicuña Porto), Juan Minujín (Ventura Prieto), Nahuel Cano (Manuel Fernández), Daniel Veronese (Gobernador), Rafael Spregelburd (Capitán Hipólito Parrilla).
 
The character Don Diego de Zama, who is at the heart of Lucrecia Martel’s wonderfully surreal, absurdist, comedic new film would be sympathetic if he weren’t so pathetic, and if he wasn’t a Colonist who seems completely unaware of the harm he is doing. He is an emissary of the Spanish government, stationed at a remote, rural outpost in what is now Paraguay, but in many ways, he is a man caught between the old and new world, not fitting in with either. He was born in the America’s, which in causes many of his Spanish cohorts to look down on him, but that hasn’t led him to any kinship whatsoever with those people he is partially responsible for keeping enslaved – far from it, really – he wants even more to be one of the Spanish.
 
All Zama really wants is a transfer out of this hellhole, and stationed in a more desirable location. In order to do that however, he needs to Governor to write a letter to the king requesting the transfer. One thing after another comes in blocking a letter from being written – at Zama’s most heartbreaking moment of realization, cosmic forces seem to mock him even more when he has to share the screen with a llama. An underling seems to get everything Zama wants, and he just has to suck it up. A new governor comes in, and with it, a whole new series of tasks that must be performed to get that prized letter – Zama only eventually realizes that even that won’t save him. He is far from his wife and children – who don’t even bother to write him anymore. He has an illegitimate child with a native woman, but cannot really see him either. He gets mixed signals from a Spanish noblewoman (Almodovar favorite Lola Dueñas), who may not be toying with him for her own amusement. Eventually deciding that he is never going to leave this place, he volunteers for an assignment that will take him into the wilderness to track down a legendary bandit – who may or may not even exist (through the first two thirds of the movie, this bandit’s death is reported several times).
 
Lucrecia Martel is one of the most distinctive filmmakers working today. Her films include Le Cienaga (unseen by me), The Holy Girl and The Headless Woman (both wonderful) – and this is her first feature since then, nearly a decade ago. The period detail here is excellent – the buzzing sound design even better (whether it’s the sound of nature overwhelming Zama, or the buzzing in his own mind as he gets bad news). The cinematography is also among the best of the year – especially in the final third, as Zama heads out into the wilderness with his group in search of that bandit. That is when the film descends into true madness that will likely bring to mind films like Herzog’s Aguirre, the Wrath of God.
 
Mostly though, Zama is an absurdist comedy – although one that doesn’t really produce any laughs. You could describe his quest to get transferred as Kafka-esque – although it’s a different kind of bureaucracy that Zama falls victim to here. His story is in many ways tragic – but it’s a tragedy of his own making, made even worse by the fact he doesn’t seem to realize it.
 
Zama is, like all of Martel’s films, its own unique thing. I will admit that the film doesn’t spend any time at all on placing anything into context – and so for viewers like myself, who perhaps doesn’t know as much about this time period, the film can seem more than a little alienating at times. And yet, it still ended up drawing me into this nightmare scenario, in which Zama cannot escape.

Sunday, December 27, 2009

DVD Views: The Headless Woman

The Headless Woman *** ½
Directed By:
Lucrecia Martel.
Written By: Lucrecia Martel.
Starring: María Onetto (Verónica), Claudia Cantero (Josefina), César Bordón (Marcos), Daniel Genoud (Juan Manuel), Guillermo Arengo (Marcelo), Inés Efron (Candita), María Vaner (Tía Lala).

Veronica (Maria Onetto) is driving down a deserted street when her cell phone rings. In her rush to answer it, she takes her eyes off the road, and hits something. She bumps her head, and is shaken up, but after a moment she drives on. We see something in the middle of the road in her rearview mirror. But she doesn’t seem to notice. She continues on with her day, meets up with her lover in a hotel, goes to the hospital to get the bump on her head looked at, and then tries to forget what happened. But she cannot forget, even though she seems to have amnesia. She becomes convinced that she did not hit a dog on the road, but rather a small native boy in the street. Although all the men in her life look into what happened, and cannot find any record of an accident that day that matches the description, she is still convinced. She allows them to take over for her. The cover her tracks, pulling strings to get the hotel and hospital records to disappear. They fix the car on the down low. They get her to dye her hair black. They cover her tracks excellently. It doesn’t matter to them if she hit a dog or a little boy. Because they are upper class, and the boy, if she indeed hit a boym is one of the poverty stricken people in Argentina, he might as well be a dog.

The Headless Woman is a difficult movie to wrap your head around. Having seen it once, I feel that I have just begun to scratch the surface of its mysteries. It has a distinctive look and feel to it. It is somewhere between David Lynch and Roman Polanski in terms of its style. What happens in the movie may not have really happened at all. Or perhaps it does. I’m not really sure. What I am sure of, is that while I was watching the movie, I felt like I was in the hands of a master filmmaker. Lucrecia Martel follows up her wonderful film The Holy Girl with an even more dense, interesting mystery.

At the heart of the movie is a wonderful performance by Maria Onetto as the woman. It is one of the more passive performances I have seen in a central role in a film in a while. She at first denies that anything happened at all, then she hides behind her supposed amnesia, and lets the men in her life take over. Her lover, her uncle, her husband, all of them has power, and all of them pull strings to protect her. If she did kill a poor kid, his family won’t stand a chance. The movie really is a family movie at heart - a movie about a dysfunctional, bourgeois family in crisis. The line between rich and poor is obvious from the outset. Often we see poor people in the background, cooking, cleaning and doing other menial chores. Or in one scene when Onetto goes into slums herself they seem to surround her, but she hardly notices. She hardly notices anything. She is almost like an observer in her own life.

I am sure that some people are going to be frustrated by the ambiguous nature of the ending. Martel does not bother to spell everything out for the audience. But in a very real way, it does not matter if she killed a dog, killed a poor kid or killed nothing. That’s not really the point of the film. The point is how Onetto reacts when she thinks she has killed someone. That nightmare feeling of paranoia and doubt creeping into her mind. It is also about the corrupt society run by men that can seem to get away with anything they want, and how the poor die all the time and no one really notices. After one viewing of The Headless Woman, I am still trying to figure it all out. Perhaps this film is the masterpiece - that many critics seem to be claiming it is - or perhaps it really does deserve to be booed like it was upon its debut at Cannes in 2008. I’m not really sure. What I am sure of is that The Headless Woman is like no other film I have seen this year.