Thursday, April 2, 2020

Classic Movie Review: Prince of Darkness (1987)

Prince of Darkness (1987) 
Directed by: John Carpenter.
Written by: John Carpenter (as Martin Quatermass).
Starring: Donald Pleasence (Priest), Jameson Parker (Brian Marsh), Victor Wong (Prof. Howard Birack), Lisa Blount (Catherine Danforth), Dennis Dun (Walter), Susan Blanchard (Kelly), Anne Marie Howard (Susan Cabot), Ann Yen (Lisa), Ken Wright (Lomax), Dirk Blocker (Mullins), Jessie Lawrence Ferguson (Calder), Peter Jason (Dr. Paul Leahy), Robert Grasmere (Frank Wyndham), Thom Bray (Etchinson), Joanna Merlin (Bag Lady), Alice Cooper (Street Schizo), Betty Ramey (Nun). 
 
No one thinks that Prince of Darkness is one of John Carpenter’s masterpieces- although it has gained a cult following after an initially bad reception when it released in 1987. This was Carpenter returning to his lower budget horror roots after Starman and Big Trouble in Little China – two bigger budget films, that weren’t huge hits at the time. In many ways, it does feel like Carpenter playing homage to himself – he has a group of people trapped in a single building by the hordes outside a la Assault on Precinct 13, and has a villain that can end up inhabiting the people, one at a time, so you’re not quite sure who to trust a la The Thing. Hell, it has Donald Pleasance in it as a Priest, and while his name isn’t said in the movie itself, in the credits, it is Father Loomis – which of course is the name of his Halloween character. In some ways, the character is the same as well – this Priest knows that evil is coming, but cannot get people to believe him.
 
Prince of Darkness is an odd film indeed. Carpenter had an interest in quantum mechanics and physics at the time, and he seems to be setting up the age-old conflict between science and religion. There is something locked in the basement of this church (considering the title of the movie, no points for guessing what) – and it has awoken, and is ready to come out. Instead of just counting on religion however to keep it contained – he calls on Professor Howard Birack (Victor Wong), a physics professor at a local university who enlists the help of his best students, complete with all the technology that the cast of Strange Things could dream of, to find a scientific solution to their problems. Science and religion are both in conflict in this movie, but also working together in a strange way.
 
Carpenter’s basic strategy here is the same as it was in The Thing – he wanted to build a mounting sense of dread in the movie, moving slowly, building suspense before the climax. That it isn’t as successful as it was in The Thing is obvious. Mainly that’s because Carpenter’s screenplay strains with unnecessary exposition and scientific explanations – dialogue that is deadly to deliver. The cast is mainly fairly dull – they never are able to bring to life what are basically archetypes. The couple at the center is Brian (Jameson Parker) and Catherine (Lisa Blount) – a pair of students who fall in bed, and then in love, in short order – a movie meant to make the ending hit harder, so it’s not just a bunch of cookie cutter characters being offed one by one. Blount fares better than Parker here – he really is the most bland of all bland leading men – so the ultimate ending certainly does have a kick, particularly the final shot.
 
But the star here really is Carpenter – who despite the flaws in the narrative, really does nail the mounting dread. I think some work needed to be done perhaps on the homeless horde outside to make them more menacing (and believable) than they are here. But Carpenter’s slow mounting dread is expertly handled, his score his excellent. His best decision is to shoot the dreams the team has – radio transmission from the future – or consumer grade VHS – the grainy, fuzzy look working perfect to make them even creepier. Prince of Darkness still isn’t one of Carpenter’s best films – it doesn’t hold a candle to Assault on Precinct 13, Halloween, The Thing or Christine – and it doesn’t have the ambition of its follow-up – They Live – but it’s better than they gave it credit for in 1987 – and worth the attention of the horror auteur’s fans.

No comments:

Post a Comment