Oscar Reactions
So,
another Oscar year is in the books – and I have to say, I’m kind of relieved. They
show last night wasn’t particularly good – either in terms of the show itself,
or the winners, but it wasn’t a tragedy either. So, let’s have a look back at
what happened last night – in three categories – my predictions, the winners
and the show itself.
Predictions
To put it
mildly, I did awful in my predictions this year – getting only 13 out of 21
correct. With the benefit of hindsight, I will admit that I probably looked
into my predictions too early, and was too stubborn to change them even when
evidence suggested I was wrong. I got three top categories wrong – Picture,
Director and Actor. I am not shocked that Birdman won either Picture or
Director – but I was kind of expecting a split in those two awards between
Birdman and Boyhood – it would have been safer to bet on Birdman for both, but
I stuck with Boyhood for both thinking the split would happen, and I’d get one
of two. Didn’t happen. I’m still mystified at how Birdman became the big Oscar
winner of the night – and yet Michael Keaton lost Best Actor to Eddie Redmayne.
Still, the writing was on the wall, so I should have seen it coming. I also got
Original Screenplay wrong – thinking that Academy would not see a reason to
give Birdman everything, so that would go to Grand Budapest. Once again, wrong.
I got two of the Whiplash wins wrong – thinking that Editing for Boyhood was
going to happen, and betting on American Sniper for both sound awards (hell, it
won one). I got Foreign Language wrong – it was a tossup, but I thought
Leviathan had more audience appeal than Ida – and clearly, I was wrong. I got
animated film wrong – thinking How to Train Your Dragon 2 was going to win, and
instead they went with Big Hero 6. If The Lego Movie couldn’t win – and the two
smaller nominees couldn’t either, it was a tossup. I tossed wrong.
This was
as bad as I have ever done predicting wise. Most of the time, when I lock in
around the time of the nominations, I am normally right. This year, changes
happened in Phase 2 – post nominations – and I didn’t react enough to them.
Lesson learned.
The Winners
In terms
of the actual awards, I was happier in the first half of the program than the
second half. The two supporting acting races went as expected – but both
Simmons and Arquette were more than deserving, so that was good. The Grand Budapest
Hotel (rightly) dominated the “below the line” categories – picking up Oscars
for Costume, Production Design, Makeup and Score (the last one finally giving the
great Alexandre Desplat his Oscar). Whiplash and American Sniper splitting the
Sound awards was fine, and Emmanuel Lubezki winning his second cinematography
Oscar in a row was ok with me (even if I would have picked Grand Budapest or
Mr. Turner there instead). Ida is a fine Best Foreign Language Film winner –
one of the best in years really – and I have no strong feelings about Big Hero
6 winning animated film, or Citizenfour winning Documentary. Neither was my
choice – but my choices weren’t nominated. Selma winning Song was also a
fitting tribute to that movie – that should have been nominated for a lot more.
How can anyone be upset about Interstellar winning Visual Effects – even if you
didn’t love the film?
It was
when Whiplash won editing that things started to turn. Any chance of Boyhood
holding on to win either Picture or Director (or even screenplay) seemed to go
away when Whiplash won. If the Academy didn’t love the editing of 12 years’
worth of footage together to make a coherent movie, than they clearly didn’t love
the movie very much. I say this as someone who thinks Whiplash was a worthy
winner – better than most winners in this category really – but still, when
that happened, I knew what was coming.
It got
worse when Birdman won Original Screenplay. If there was one category that
Birdman really didn’t deserve to win – it was here. What was worse, is that I
thought this would be Wes Anderson’s consolation prize for Grand Budapest –
which was my favorite of the year. If Richard Linklater had won for Boyhood, I
also would have been happy. But if there was any doubt that a Birdman sweep was
coming, it was when it won here. Its eventual wins for Picture and Director
became a foregone conclusion. (I’ll circle back to Birdman in a moment).
The
awards for the two lead acting categories were anti-climactic. I don’t know how
anyone can be upset with Julianne Moore winning an Oscar – she should have at least
two or three at home by now. I just wish it had been for one of her better
performances than Still Alice. Eddie Redmayne’s win is still strange to me –
how the hell did the Academy love Birdman THIS much, and not give this award to
Keaton? Redmayne’s win is the kind that will be held up for mockery in years to
come when people say they always give Oscars to actors playing in biopics and
people with disabilities. It was a fine performance – WAY better than the movie
itself, but it doesn’t come much more Oscar clichéd than this one.
So back
to Birdman in a moment. I’m not going to insult a movie that I really like. I
watched it again (with my wife, on DVD) the night before the Oscars – and while
the things I didn’t like bugged me even more the second time through, it’s
still a really good film that I think is very much of its time and place
(perhaps a little too much, but whatever). For me, it fits right in with recent
winners like Argo, The Artist or The King’s Speech – fine films all, but
nothing I would say is a masterpiece. Yes, it makes the Academy look even more
ego-maniacal than normal – as for the third time in four years they have given
a film about Hollywood the Best Picture Oscar. But it’s a fine film just the
same.
What
bugged me a little bit though was just how much they loved Birdman – how by
giving it Picture, Director and Original Screenplay, the Academy is basically
saying that Alejandro Gonzalez Innaritu deserves three Oscars for Birdman, and
Richard Linklater and Wes Anderson deserve zero for Boyhood or The Grand Budapest
Hotel. I have a feeling that Wes Anderson may be entering the post-Fargo Coen
brother period of his career, Oscar-wise (that is, a long time, quirky,
critically acclaimed auteurs that the Academy ignored for a long time that they
finally come around on. Perhaps he does have an Oscar win at some point in his
future. I’m not as convinced with Richard Linklater – who has probably done the
most acclaimed film he will ever make in Boyhood, and they still basically
shrugged their shoulders at the film. We’ll most likely see a clip of him
receiving an honorary Oscar thirty years down the line.
But
Birdman is far from an embarrassment. It would not have been my choice, but it’s
a decent one just the same. They’ve done both better and worst in the past –and
will do so again in the future.
The Show
I’m not
going to say too much about the show itself – which by and large was the kind
of long, boring slog that some people think every Oscar show, although usually
I defend them. I cannot really defend this one. I don’t know what happened –
Neil Patrick Harris is talented – he can sing, dance and is funny – and yet for
the most part, he fell flat for me last night. I’ll give him the benefit of the
doubt and say it was the material and not him – especially since he has been
good as hosting other things in the past. Still, I won’t be sad if he doesn’t
host again – and if he does, that he’ll leave poor Octavia Spencer alone.
The
musical numbers were, for the most part, underwhelming. Everything is Awesome
was fun – but that was because is was a complete and total mess (or at least
seemed like). The one exception was John Legend and Common – who killed it on
Glory. The odd tribute to The Sound of Music – which didn’t start until well
after 11pm my time, was overlong, and I just wanted to see Birdman win so I
could go to bed – but damn it, Lady Gaga can sing.
Strangely,
the best thing about the show were the speeches – many of whom were memorable
in that they didn’t just list off a bunch of names and bore us, but actually
were heartfelt and meaningful. No, Graham Moore shouldn’t have won for The
Imitation Game – but that was a great speech. As were the ones by J.K. Simmons,
Patricia Arquette, John Legend & Common and several others. No one was
better than Pawel Pawlikowski, who outlasted the orchestra that was trying to
play him off – and it was glorious. Years from now, the speeches will be
remember from this year’s Oscars – and not much else.
And so,
that does it. In the end, it was a great year for movies – and you know
something, the Academy recognized some of the best of them. Yes, more so in the
nominating round than the winning round, but any year that films as wonderful
and diverse as Boyhood, The Grand Budapest Hotel, American Sniper, Selma,
Whiplash and, yes, Birdman, got nominated for Oscars, is a good year. Yes, it
ended with a whimper, but you cannot win them all.
No comments:
Post a Comment