Directed by: Clint Eastwood.
Written by: Jason Hall based on the book by Chris Kyle and Scott McEwen and James Defelice.
Starring: Bradley Cooper (Chris Kyle), Sienna Miller (Taya), Kyle Gallner (Goat-Winston), Cole Konis (Young Chris Kyle), Ben Reed (Wayne Kyle), Luke Sunshine (Young Jeff Kyle), Keir O'Donnell (Jeff Kyle), Sammy Sheik (Mustafa), Tim Griffin (Colonel Gronski), Luis Jose Lopez (Sanchez), Brian Hallisay (Capt. Gillespie), Erik Aude (Thompson), Jad Mhidi Senhaji (Omar), Navid Negahban (Sheikh Al-Obodi), Sam Jaeger (Navy Seal Lt. Martin), Chance Kelly (Lt. Col Jones), Ayman Samman (Father).
It`s always a shame when
a film becomes a political football – to be punted back and forth between people
who seem to only be capable of seeing things in terms of black and white,
liberal and conservative, good and evil. It’s an even bigger shame when that
movie is a film like Clint Eastwood's American Sniper – which is a much more
nuanced film than many seem to want to think it is. Going into the film, I was
confused by the rhetoric being written on both sides that the film was a
rah-rah, pro-gun, pro-America, pro-war anti-Muslim, xenophobic screed. It
confused me because while Clint is certainly guilty of making himself into a caricature
on film, and in his infamous speech to empty chair Obama at the RNC, as an
artist he has always had a more nuanced, complex view of violence. This is the
man who made Unforgiven with its famous line “Hell of a thing, killing a man.
You take away all he`s got, all he`s ever going to have”. The man who made
Flags of Our Fathers, which was one of the more complex looks at American
heroism in WWII put on film, and then followed it up with Letters from Iwo
Jima, which looked at the war from the opposite side without demonizing anyone.
American Sniper fits neatly in with those films in that it looks at the
consequences of violence on a man who apparently has the most confirmed kills
of any serviceman in American history – consequences that he both realizes and
doesn’t realize. I’m not going to say that American Sniper is an anti-war film
– it isn’t – or that it is a perfect film – it rushes through the post-war
years of its main character in 10 minutes when it needed a hell of a lot longer.
But while the film doesn’t offer a complex political view of the Iraq war –
there are no debates about the rightness or wrongness of it at all, or the
enemy – who the main character simply sees through his gun site and kills them
– I also believe that is the point of the movie. It locks in on the main
characters viewpoint, and sticks with it from beginning to end. There is value
in that as well.
The film opens with
Chris Kyle (Bradley Cooper) in Iraq, locking his sites on a child carrying a
bomb, and his mother who gave it to him. He isn’t sure if he should take the
shot or not – he hesitates for a moment, and then the film flashes back to Kyle
as a child – being instructed by his father about the way of the world. Kyle is
told there are three types of people in the world – sheep, who look away from
violence, wolves who use violence to terrify others, and sheepdogs who use
violence to protect the sheep. His father isn’t raising any sheep – and he will
kick their ass if they become wolves. That leaves only one option left for
Kyle. Eastwood flashes forward a little bit more – to 1999, when Kyle, now 30,
sees a news report about embassy bombings and gets angry. "They’re
attacking us" he says – and he immediately decides that it is time to sign
up for the military. He’s already a good shot – and he wants to fight – so he
ends up a Navy SEAL. He meets his future wife, Taya (Sienna Miller) and falls
in love – and after 9/11 he is sent to Iraq. It’s only then they we get a
resolution to the dilemma he faced in that opening scene. Even here, it is more
complex than Kyle realizes – he is congratulated for his actions, and
immediately tells the person to shut up. When he takes those shots, he is
changed – and he never quite realizes it.
The movie will spend most
its running time flashing back and forth between Kyle in the field, and his
life on the home front – which gets increasingly fragile. His family grows, but
Taya starts to think she is married to a stranger. He isn’t there even when he
is there. He sees his brother for the first time, and he is simply shell
shocked. A soldier he served alongside is killed, and when he attends the
funeral with Taya is shocked when the soldier’s mother reads a letter he wrote
just weeks before he was killed – expressing doubt about his actions. “It was
that letter that killed him” Kyle says – but he wants to believe that more than
he actually does.
It is in moments like
this, and others, that make me wonder why some people – who either love the
film or hate it – think that the film itself is an “America, fuck yeah!” war
movie, like last year’s Lone Survivor certainly was. It is there in Bradley
Coopers fine performance as Kyle – who outwardly is confident, whose words
never betray that he has doubts about what he is doing, that spouts offensive
things like the people he is fighting being savages. But Cooper’s eyes tell a
different story. He does what he does because he feels he has to – and I find
the argument that he didn’t have to absurd – he is a soldier in a warzone, and
he was doing his job, whether or not you agree with the reasons America was in
Iraq or not (and for the record, I don’t), doesn’t really matter.
Some of the other
criticisms of the film are easier to understand, even if I don’t necessarily
agree with all of them. It is true that the film doesn’t give any insight into
the Iraq war at all and why American went – but does it need to. Don’t you
already know that? And if the film never questions that involvement, I think
that’s more because Kyle himself never questions it, and the film is locked in
on his viewpoint. Kyle doesn’t want to question it – if he did, the whole
façade he has built up would come crumbling down. The film is perhaps on
shakier ground its portrayals of the Iraqi people itself – given that the film
doesn’t really give them any portrayal at all. There is only one sympathetic
character – a man who agrees to help the Americans, and pays an awful price for
that. The film certainly shows us Iraqis behaving in abhorrent ways (what
happens to that man is an example) – but again, I think it’s because the movie
is locked into Kyles viewpoint, and this is the way he sees it. The portrayal
of a rival sniper – Mustafa, rumored to be a Syrian athlete, is more
problematic – because the film never really explores that character in any real
way. He’s used as a storytelling shortcut, to give a face to what for the rest
of the movie is a faceless enemy. The ending of the film doesn’t really work at
all either. There is a moment with Kyle in a bar that would have been a better
place to stop the movie – but instead Eastwood plows on for another 10 or 15
minutes, and gives a shallow portrait of Kyles homecoming – that almost gives
you whiplash, as one moment he is seemingly stricken with PTSD, and primed to
explode, and then the next he is perfectly fine. If Eastwood wasn’t really
going to examine that conversion, he shouldn’t have started at all. But he does
this in part, because he wants to get to Kyles tragic death in 2013 – where he
was killed by another soldier suffering from PTSD, and the resulting funeral. And
don’t even get me started on what is probably the fakest looking baby in movie
history.
But overall, I think
American Sniper is an excellent film – one that resists the various black or
white, liberal or conservative boxes that everyone seems to want to put it in. It doesn’t argue that Kyle should not have done what
he did – it mostly argues, like many Eastwood films do, that violence is often
necessary, but again, like many Eastwood films argues; it does say that the
violence does have a cost on those who are forced to commit it. That makes it
very much in line with the best Clint Eastwood films he has directed – and even
if it doesn’t quite reach the level of a film like Unforgiven – well, most
films don’t. This is a film that has haunted me for days now, and will continue
to do so – so I think no matter what your thoughts on the war in Iraq or your
own political leanings, than American Sniper is a film that should be seen. But
it must be seen with a mind opened to be challenged. I don’t need a film to
confirm my political ideals to think it’s a great film.
Great write-up. A lot of people are claiming that American Sniper was saying this and that. Personally, I didn't find a political agenda within the film. Whatever conservative ideals that were present seemed necessary, considering the man Kyle was. With that being said, I still believe it's an inferior film to The Hurt Locker.
ReplyDelete