Directed by: Gavin Hood.
Written by: Gavin Hood based on the book by Orson Scott Card.
Starring: Asa Butterfield (Ender Wiggin), Harrison Ford (Colonel Graff), Hailee Steinfeld (Petra Arkanian), Abigail Breslin (Valentine Wiggin), Ben Kingsley (Mazer Rackham), Viola Davis (Major Gwen Anderson), Aramis Knight (Bean), Suraj Partha (Alai), Moises Arias (Bonzo Madrid), Khylin Rhambo (Dink Meeker), Jimmy 'Jax' Pinchak (Peter Wiggin), Nonso Anozie (Sergeant Dap), Conor Carroll (Bernard ).
For
the most part, I believe that you have to except the basic principle of a
movie. Some like to dig in and map out all the logic flaws in a time travel
movie for instance – showing how what happens in the movie will make the
universe implode – but to me I try to just except the basic premise of any
movie and go with it. You can make a good movie – or at least an entertaining
one – out of the most ridiculous premise imaginable – if you at least stick to
your own rules. In relation to Ender’s Game however, I never could quite
believe the founding premise of the film – that children and not adults are
best suited for war, because they are more empathetic, so they can better
intuit the moves of the enemy. I don’t think this is entirely my fault – the
movie does a very poor job of establishing the why and how this premise was
established in this world, and the movie, which seems to be about the main
character trying to find balance between two extremes – empathy and violence –
is also poorly handled. The movie, which has a lot of weighty ideas in it,
especially for a Young Adult one, is more interested in special effects than
anything else – and that ends up hurting the film immeasurably.
We
first meet Ender Wiggin (Asa Butterfield) while he’s at school, training to see
if he has what it takes to be a soldier in the fight against the Formics – an
alien race who tried to invade Earth 50 years before, but were eventually
defeated – but only after millions of people lost their lives. Humans were
unprepared last time, but won’t be next time. Colonel Graff (Harrison Ford) is
convinced Ender is “the one” – but needs to put him through one final test
before he can go off to Battle School – which Ender passes by putting a much
larger child in the hospital. He didn’t pass because he was quick to violence –
he passed because of the reason he put the kid in the hospital – he kicked him
when he was down to prevent future fights.
In
voiceover, Ender tells us that he must balance out the traits of his two older
siblings – Peter, who is sadistic and quick to violence, and Valentine (Abigail
Breslin) who is too empathetic. He has to strike the middle ground – being
willing to dole out violence when need be, but still empathetic enough to
understand his enemy. Graff immediately singles Ender out in Battle school – which,
of course, makes all the other kids hate him, which is precisely what Graff
wants. Graff wants Ender to become hard, and believe that no one will ever be
there to help him. He is, in theory, balanced out by Anderson (Viola Davis),
who takes Ender’s mental well-being seriously, but since Graff outranks her, he
just steamrolls over all of her concerns. Graff’s plan doesn’t work too well
anyway – as Ender still does manage to make friends – in particular Petra
(Hailee Steinfeld), who helps him train in the Zero-G room for battle
simulations.
Ender’s
Game didn’t really work for me. From the beginning, we know Ender is the
“chosen one” – the Luke Skywalker of the movie – and the film treats that as
pretty much a given. As Ender gets promoted – time and again – through the
ranks rather quickly, I was always left wondering why. What did he do that was
so much greater than everyone else? Why is Graff so convinced of his abilities?
Why does Sergeant Dap (Nonso Alonzie), who in one scene says he’ll never salute
Ender, end up changing his mind just a few scenes later? I never quite
understood why they thought Ender struck the balance between empathy and
violence they want so bad so perfectly – when he does react violently, it’s
always in self-defense – which is not what they want him to do to the Formics.
They want a pre-emptive strike, which is the exact opposite of self-defense.
The film also foreshadows it’s ending way too heavily (I won’t say how, because
if I did, the ending would become immediately apparent to anyone who may see
the film). And I do not think the end of the movie really works. The film wants
to have a moral complexity in its final moments that the rest of the film
pretty much refuses to have.
All
this probably makes it sound like I hated Ender’s Game. I didn’t – although I
find the movie ultimately unsatisfying, there are still some good things in the
movie. Asa Butterfield confirms the talent he showed as the title character in
Martin Scorsese’s Hugo – and, to a lesser extent, Hailee Steinfeld confirms the
talent she showed in the Coen’s True Grit. Harrison Ford is not just
sleepwalking through his role as Graff, as he has done far too often lately.
Viola Davis is a much needed sympathetic presence, and Ben Kingsley is in fine
form as another mentor. In short – the acting is almost universally very good –
although the actors are undercut by a screenplay too full of exposition – and
not the kind of exposition I would have found fascinating (about the morality
of what they are doing), but the kind where characters spend entire scenes
explaining the rules of everything to each other for no reason other than
without it, the audience would be lost. The special effects are generally quite
good as well.
I
have not read the novel by Orson Scott Card, so I cannot say how the movie
stacks up against it (I wanted to read it, but my pretty pathetic public
library has had the book “on order” for six months now, and I’m too cheap to
buy many books). I am willing to bet however that book is more complex than the
movie – and spends more time on the morality of what is going on. There is a
reason this movie has languished in one sort of development hell or another for
over 20 years now, and why there were dozens of drafts of the screenplay at
various points. In the end though, it’s what is on screen that counts – and
what’s there is a promising idea, that is never fully executed.
No comments:
Post a Comment