Spider-Man:
Homecoming *** ½ / *****
Directed
by: Jon
Watts.
Written
by: Jonathan
Goldstein & John Francis Daley and Jon Watts & Christopher Ford and Chris
McKenna & Erik Sommers based on the Marvel comic by Stan Lee & Steve
Ditko.
Starring:
Tom
Holland (Peter Parker / Spider-Man), Michael Keaton (Adrian Toomes / Vulture),
Robert Downey Jr. (Tony Stark / Iron Man), Marisa Tomei (May Parker), Jon
Favreau (Happy Hogan), Jacob Batalon (Ned), Zendaya (Michelle), Laura Harrier
(Liz), Tony Revolori (Flash), Gwyneth Paltrow (Pepper Potts), Donald Glover (Aaron
Davis), Bokeem Woodbine (Herman Schultz / Shocker #2), Tyne Daly (Anne Marie
Hoag), Abraham Attah (Abe), Hannibal Buress (Coach Wilson), Martin Starr (Mr.
Harrington), Garcelle Beauvais (Doris Toomes), Michael Chernus (Phineas Mason /
The Tinkerer), Michael Mando (Mac Gargan), Logan Marshall-Green (Jackson Brice
/ Shocker #1), Jennifer Connelly (Karen / Suit Lady).
Mark me down as one of those
crazy people who thinks we didn’t really need a third Spider-Man franchise
started in the last 15 years, and one of those even crazier people who thinks
that even if we did that, we don’t need it to connect to the larger Marvel
Cinematic Universe, which is already bursting at the seams with many memorable
heroes, and one memorable villain. I think it’s doubtful that a Spider-Man
movie will ever top Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man 2 – which remains one of the great
superhero movies ever made, mainly because it’s done with the boring origin
story (I was never much of a fan of Raimi’s original Spider-Man), but hadn’t gotten
to the going through the motion phase of the third installment. While Raimi
knew he was making franchise films each and every time – and knew sequels were
possible, they weren’t inevitable, so he could work on telling his own story. I
didn’t dislike the Marc Webb Amazing Spider-Man films like many did – I may
even argue the first one is a better origin story than Raimi’s first one – but they
were wholly unnecessary. Perhaps the best thing to say about Spider-Man:
Homecoming is that they don’t cast some poor sap to play Uncle Ben to tell
Peter that “With great power comes great responsibility” before being shot.
Ok, now, I’m just being an
asshole, because that isn’t the best thing about Spider-Man: Homecoming (it is,
however, a relief) – which overall is – like most of the films in the MCU – a fun,
entertaining film, a breezy, entertaining way to kill a couple of hours and
have a hell of a lot of fun. No, it isn’t as good as Raimi’s Spider-Man 2 – but
perhaps it’s the second best Spider-Man film so far, so there’s that – and while
the film does take pains to connect itself to the larger MCU – starting right
where the fight in Captain America: Civil War, which introduced this
Spider-Man, left off – there is hope that in the future, it won’t be quite as
beholden to it.
So, the good news is that there
is no Uncle Ben, no radioactive spider bite, not hour of a kid discovering his
powers, and thinking that they’re supercool, before he gets in over his head
using them. He pretty much already starts there, when he stumbles across some
thugs selling some powerful weapons, built using alien technology. He follows
along this path, and it leads to Adrian Toomes (Michael Keaton, because
apparently the message of Birdman is that all actors should do Superhero
movies) – who 8 years ago in 2012 (yeah, I know, that doesn’t make sense –just role
with it) was kicked off the sweet salvage he thought he had cleaning up after
Loki attacked New York – and got pissed. Now, he and his crew get all the alien
tech they can, make weapons out of it, and will sell it to anyone. Peter tells
Tony Stark about it, but he doesn’t seem to care, so Peter decides it’s all on
him to stop him – despite the fact that Peter also pretty lives in a 1980s John
Hughes movie version of high school, where he and his nerdy best friend, Ned (Jacob
Batalon) pine after the pretty Liz (Laura Harrier), even if we know Peter’s
real love interest is eventually going to be the cynical Michelle (because she
is played by teen star Zendaya).
The film was directed by Jon
Watts, whose previous film was the low budget indie Cop Car, which wasn’t a bad
film by any means, although it is the type that makes you wonder why they hired
him to make a Spider-Man film. He handles the movie well for the most part – I
thought the action sequences moved a touch too quickly at times, but at least didn’t
succumb to rapid fire editing, so that’s a plus. I almost preferred the films
action climax – where for reasons to complicated to get into here – Peter has
to wear his very low tech suit, as opposed to the high tech one he had for the
rest of the film – as everything did feel a little bit more like I was watching
a human and a little bit less like I was watching a computer program.
As Peter, Tom Holland delivers a
fine performance – he perhaps whines a little too much, but then again, he’s a
teenager, so that’s kind of his thing. He’ll be a good Spider-Man for a while,
and hopefully, they’ll let this one age a little bit before thrusting us back
in high school with a fourth iteration of the character. Keaton is nicely menacing,
and refreshingly, he has rather down-to-earth motivations, rather than world domination
or an obsession with infinity stones – which oddly, has been driving this
larger franchise for nearly a decade now, and no one much seems to care if they
ever pay that off. Can Robert Downey Jr. take some time off from Iron Man
though? I know he’s seemingly the only major actor in this franchise who
appears to have lost in interest in doing anything else other than play Iron
Man (and isn’t that just a little bit sad), but I could use a break from his
Tony Stark for a while.
I know this review probably
sounds harsher or more cynical than I intended it to. Spider-Man: Homecoming
really is a fun movie, and I would gladly watch another installment of this Peter
Parker fighting bad guys (especially if that bad guy turns out to be Michael
Mando, from Breaking Bad/Better Call Saul, as setup in this film). It’s hard
not to be a little cynical about these movies though isn’t it, which are more
money and rights issues, etc. than actually making good movies. If they do make
good movies, that’s a plus for the studios, not an imperative. This time, it’s
a plus, so I guess we should be happy with that and move on to Thor: Ragnorok
in a few months.
No comments:
Post a Comment