Weiner
Directed by: Josh Kriegman &
Elyse Steinberg.
Weiner
is a documentary that you want watch through your fingers – you want to flinch
and look away at the painful awkwardness on screen, but you simply cannot. It’s
the type of documentary that you see and wonder why the subjects would have
ever agreed to let the film get made at all. I mean, Anthony Weiner had to see
this coming, right? After everything he went through in 2011, when the original
sexting scandal broke – how he went from the future of the Democratic Party
into a late night TV punch line, overnight, eventually resigning in disgrace.
When, two years later, he decided to try and restart his political career,
running for Mayor of New York, and knowing full well that there were more, and
more explicit, texts and message out there, he had to have known that the whole
thing might erupt again and make him look bad, right? Why the hell would he not
only want to risk that by running for office again, and why the hell would he
agree to have a documentary crew follow him around as he does? Near the end of
the film, after everything has turned to shit, one of the directors ask Weiner
this very question. Tellingly, Weiner doesn’t reply.
Josh
Kriegman & Elyse Steinberg’s Weiner will likely go down as one of the best
political documentaries of recent years – and it fully deserves to. It gives us
an inside look at politics in the way we normally never get to see – because most
politicians are too guarded and cautious to allow that sort of look. Anthony
Weiner is neither of those things, which is perhaps why he did let them film it
– he figured he weathered the storm, and it was over. He was wrong. The opening
scenes of the movie recap Weiner’s career in Congress – where he was fiery and
passionate and articulate, and refused to give into what he saw as the bullying
tactics of the Republicans. It then, briefly, recaps how that all came crashing
down – when he accidentally tweeted a picture of his penis, yes, inside
underwear but we could all see the outline, to everyone in his feed, instead of
a private message. What followed was Weiner trying to lie his way out of the
scandal, until he no longer could, and resigned. The rest of the film takes
place in 2013, when Weiner decides to run for Mayor of New York.
His
campaign gets off to a rocky start – he has to field a lot of questions about
his personal life, his sexting, and everything else. But he seems to weather it
– he seems like a genuinely smart, passionate and articulate person – and the
polls show that he could actually win this thing. People seem willing to
forgive and forget, and move on. And then, the other shoe drops. More messages,
more explicit pictures, and one of the women he sexted with – Sydney Leathers –
who will seemingly do anything for her 15 minutes of fame, who continues to
flog the story. It is irresistible to late night comedians – sex scandals are inherently
amusing, especially ones with the type of over baked sexual texts Weiner was
sending, and because, of course, when he went on those sites he used an assumed
name – Carlos Danger. How could anyone not make fun of him (the fact that his
last name was Weiner is, of course, also part of it)?
At
this point, the writing seems to be on the wall. Weiner is going to lose. He
drops 10 points in a week – some of his advisers, in a painful phone call, tell
him to drop out – he has no path to victory. His relationship with the media
becomes overtly combative. But damn it all, Weiner presses on – he will not be
bowed or broken, even when he has no chance.
All
of this would be more than enough for a documentary – and a very good one. What
I think gives the film another layer though is the portrait it paints of Weiner’s
marriage – to Huma Abedin, a long time Hilary Clinton staffer, who has risen
over the years to becomes one of her most trusted advisers (many rumors think
Abedin will be Clinton’s Chief of Staff once he humiliates Trump in November).
Weiner loves the camera, but Abedin cannot stand it. She speaks at some events,
even at the Press Conference when the scandal erupts again, but she would much
rather be neither seen nor heard on the campaign trail. Their marriage has
obviously been through a lot – they explicitly mention that the texts that
cause the second scandal were during a time they thought of separately. There
are snippy comments Weiner makes to her (“Make sure you leave a few minutes
after me – otherwise someone may think we are married”). Abedin eyes the camera
warily throughout – she never really sits down for an interview with the
documentarians like Weiner does, and saying little on camera. He is a
sympathetic person throughout the film – an obviously intelligent woman who, I
think, would rather being going through this in private. She is also more than
a little bit of an enigma.
As
a documentary, Weiner is funny and sad, cringe worthy and fascinating. You want
to look away – it’s never lost on the audience that we are watching real people
go through something painful and personal – but you cannot. It’s one of the
best docs of the year.
No comments:
Post a Comment