Saturday, January 11, 2020

2019 Year End Report: An Introduction

I read over a few of my past Introductions to my year end reports before sitting down to write this one – something I probably haven’t done in the past, but probably should have. There are themes that have developed in the past decade – about Hollywood’s increasing reliance on tent poles, on the shrinking market for adult oriented movies, about Netflix entering the scenes, about film vs. TV, etc. In short, it has been about film in transition – what many people would call crisis.
 
I thought of this a lot in the past few months – perhaps because of Martin Scorsese’s comments about Marvel, which people took FAR too seriously. Is anything Scorsese said really wrong about Marvel? I like the Marvel movies – you can find positive reviews of pretty much all of them here if you wanted to, but he is right that they bear little resemblance to the types of films he makes, or loves. He calls them theme park rides, I call them assembly line products. In my more generous moments, I compare them to a TV series with three supersized episodes per season – they look the same, sound the same, and just further this massively complex storyline. In my less generous moments, I compare them to McDonalds – the audiences go to see the Marvel movies because they already know precisely what they’re going to see before they sit down. Go to any McDonalds, and order a Big Mac and fries, and you’ll get the exact same thing every time. You know what it will taste like, there are no surprises, etc. That is Marvel movies. Don’t get me wrong – sometimes we all crave a Big Mac, and want nothing but a Big Mac. There is a reason McDonalds is hugely successful and that’s the reason. But if you ate nothing but Big Macs all the time, it wouldn’t be good for you.
 
The problem I see is not that Marvel is making the cinematic equivalent of Big Macs – it’s that increasingly, that is all people can see in a theater. Underlying Scorsese’s comments was the fact that he had been trying to make The Irishman for years – and even if DeNiro, Pacino and Pesci attached, no one other Netflix would give him the money to do so. Scorsese wanted his film to play in theaters – and while it played in some (which is where I first saw it) – it didn’t play in most. The Netflix factor hurt it, of course (the chains won’t play Netflix films) – but truth be told, how long would The Irishman played in theaters even if it wasn’t a Netflix film – before it was shoved out for more corporate product.
 
And worse, is just how offended everyone got about what Scorsese said – as if he was attacking their religion or something. It’s one thing to like Big Macs – it’s another thing to insist that they are the height of cuisine. Scorsese was called a snob – I’m sure there are some in the few who will read this that will say the same thing about me – but he’s not wrong. I think somewhere along the way we’ve lost the plot here a little bit. Superhero movies are great for many audiences – for kids they are great (my daughter has been running around as Captain Marvel since seeing the movie) – but I’m kind of sad that we’ve become a culture where the most popular art for children is also the most popular art for adults. Perhaps all those people who complained about adults reading Harry Potter obsessively were onto something the rest of missed all those years ago.
 
What I really say though is this – just like with McDonalds, you shouldn’t just consume the corporate product that is released or 3,000 screen every week. If you eat nothing but McDonalds, you’ll get sick. If you watch nothing but this corporate product, you’ll get sick in another way. Like what you like – that’s fine – but expand a little bit more as well. Movie culture is in trouble if all we get is sequels and series and shared universes made by committee.
 
Moving on to the films of 2019 themselves – in some ways, it makes me sad, it some ways it offers hope. I happen to think this is the best year in films in quite some time – perhaps even of this decade. My top two films are masterpieces by two of my all-time favorite directors – and even if both of them feel like summations in some sense, it also proves they still have it. And there were quite a few younger filmmakers still emerging – and even following up great debuts (or perhaps second films) with films that were often more ambitious, and they hold out hope for the future. Not only that, but many of these filmmakers don’t seem eager to jump into the corporate product – at least not yet.
 
And so celebrate a year that included great films by masters like Tarantino, Scorsese, Malick, Bong, Baumbach, Almodovar, Denis and Gray – all of whom have been working for two decades or (much, much more). Celebrate newer voices that have followed up great films with other great films like Aster, Peele, the Safdies, Mitchell, Nemes, Shults, Eggers, Kent, Hogg, Perry, Heller, Gan, Talbot, Wang, Lesage, Petzold, etc. Marvel at the fact that one of the best feature debuts of the year was made by a veteran in his 60s. And by all means, enjoy the hell out of Marvel, Pixar, Disney and Star Wars (all owned by the same people of course) – just don’t act as if criticizing our corporate overlords is beyond the pale.
 
Now, just a couple of housekeeping things. I do try and get this out every year before Oscar nominations – but with the shortened season, not every post in this series will make it. There are also a few key films I missed – none more than Portrait of a Lady on Fire – but I didn’t really miss that, the distributer decided to do a qualifying run, then pull it until February. I’ll see it – and it could make a revised top 10 list for 2019 at some point. Other films I missed were Just Mercy, Clemency, Honeyland, Varda by Agnes, La Flor, Synonyms, Give Me Liberty, The Hottest August and I Do Not Care If We Go Down in History as Barbarians. These are the only true 2019 films that made the top 100 of my top 10 list survey of critics I did not see (and actually, those first two aren’t even on that top 100). There are others – festival hits that are going to come out really in 2020 that I did not see like Vitalina Varela, I Was at Home But, Martin Eden, Bait and Heimat is a Space in Time, that will likely be on more lists next year. There is also the strange case of My First Film (Live) which is a mixture of film and performance art, which likely, I will never see, since it requires the physical presence of the director.
 
Anyway, enjoy the week of posts. As always, I have a top 30 list, top 10 lists for each of the four acting categories, and ensemble casts, different lists for documentaries, animated films, horror films and directorial debuts, my personal Oscar ballot, and lists of the most disappointing and worst films of the year. It is, as always, way too much – but I enjoyed it. It’s also, of course, my lists and my opinion. If you don’t like my list – make your own.

Friday, January 10, 2020

The Films of Jean-Pierre Melville: Conclusion and Ranking

I have always considered myself a fan of Jean-Pierre Melville – and yet, oddly, I had only seen three of his films before embarking on this re-watch – so if nothing else, I am thankful for the Criterion Channel for including all these films on their streaming service (I would be more grateful had they included When You Read This Letter for those of us in Canada like it was in America).
 
What is remarkable looking back on his career is how short it really was – just 23 years from his first film until his last film – seven of them in the last decade, which include his most well-known films. I appreciated his earlier films – how varied they seemed to be as Melville was finding his voice, and just trying to stay afloat in an industry who never seemed to embrace him. He was French New Wave before the New Wave – then rejected by them as he wanted commercial success, and then saw his masterpiece barely get released anywhere, and greeted with a shrug. It’s undeniable that Melville didn’t get the attention he deserved in his lifetime – he was an absolute master filmmaker, and when he was at the top of his game (the top 6 films on this list at least) – he was a true master filmmaker. I’m glad he’s gotten the attention he deserved – even if it came a few decades too late.
 
12. Magnet of Doom (1963) – This is an odd film for me, right in the middle of Melville’s best known films, but more like something Wim Wenders would make a decade later, Melville never quite finds the right tone for the film, and it meanders – but it’s something odd and interesting, even if it isn’t successful.
 
11. Two Men in Manhattan (1959) – This one feels like something Melville tossed off quickly and cheaply – outdoor scenes shot in New York, indoor scenes in Paris in a studio – it’s an interesting little film, quirky and entertaining – a B-movie, which seems happy to be just that, and nothing more.
 
10. Un Flic (1972) – It can of feels like with Un Flic, Melville’s last film, he made a film about a cop and crook just going through the motions, while Melville does the same behind the camera. It is certainly the work of the man who made many of those earlier masterpieces – but there’s just something lacking here. I wonder if Melville would have reached a different stage of his career had he not died after making this one.
 
9. Les Enfants Terribles (1950) – An uneasy collaboration between a then young Melville and the veteran Jean Cocteau, where clearly Melville didn’t have complete control. Still, as a cross between two great filmmakers, it is of interest – and has a great performance by Nicole Stephane – and is genuinely weird.
 
8. Leon Morin, Priest (1961) – Oddly, Melville, a forerunner of the French New Wave, cast two of its biggest stars – Jean-Paul Belmondo and Emmanuelle Riva – and yet also angered the New Wave, when he admitted he made this one in part to make money. Odder still, this film is a long conversation – a debate – between a hot priest, and an atheist woman, during WWII which is a push and pull between the two of them and it works wonderfully.
 
7. Le Silence de la mer (1949) – Melville’s debut film is a story of the French resistance – essentially a three hander, about an old man and his niece, forced to take in a Nazi officer into his home – but refuse to talk to him. The Nazi officer envisions a world after the war in which they will all get along – and is crushed by his slow dawning realization of just what his country is. A fascinating, engrossing thriller – a film in which a single line of dialogue upends the whole film.
 
6. Le Cercle Rouge (1970) – For most other directors, Le Cercle Rouge would be their crowning achievement – but coming on the heels of so many great, similar films from Melville, it feels like more of the brilliant same from him. The impact would probably be greater had I not seen all of his films so close together – because this is a brilliantly directed and paced film, with so many amazing sequences – that it is clearly the film of a master.
 
5. Bob la Flambeur (1956) – The first truly great film of Melville’s career, Bob la Flambeur is the film that really marks Melville as a forerunner to the French New Wave – and a clear influence on films like Soderbergh’s Oceans films. It is a film of effortless cool – of an old school gambler and criminal, living by a code. It also showed where Melville was going next.
 
4. Le Doulos (1962) – Perhaps the most entertaining film Melville ever made – this film has so many twists and turns in the plot, in its story of no honor among thieves, as we think Jean-Paul Belmondo is a rat, but then we keep having that undermined, or confirmed, and back and forth. Just a marvelously fun film – with a steel core of what Melville was about to start doing.
 
3. Le Samourai (1967) – Perhaps Melville’s most famous, most celebrated film – and it is a film of simple perfection. It really boils down everything Melville had done before, and boiled it to is essential elements in its story of its hitman, who time is running out. The great Alain Delon secured his legacy here – and the final scene adds even more depth.
 
2. Le Deuxieme Souffle (1966) – Perhaps my hottest take here is that Le Deuxieme Souffle is every bit the masterpiece that Le Samourai is – the story of an aging criminal who knows his time is done, and heading done the path to his inevitable death. This is the classic “old man” movie – but made when Melville was in his 40s. Just an absolute masterpiece.
 
1. Army of Shadows (1969) – In 1969, Melville’s masterpiece was completely written off – barely seen in France, who decided it was too old fashioned, and politically out of step, and never released outside of France at all. Now, we recognize Army of Shadows as one of the greatest of all films – the story of the French resistance, which completely drains the glamor out of it. It is about people who know they will die, and do what they have to anyway. I am saddened by the fact that Melville never got to see his masterpiece recognized for what it was in his lifetime.

Thursday, January 9, 2020

Oscar Nomination Predictions

This year, I have been busy working on my year end report, and busy at work and other things – so couple with the fact that it was a very short Oscar season this year, meant I didn’t have as much time as normal to spend on my Oscar predictions. So, here they are, no explanation, no longshots, etc. – just what I think is going to be nominated in each category. I’m probably wrong on many predictions – but whatever. I will do my usual, more extensive Winner Predictions – but for now, this is what I think will be in the running.
 
Best Picture
  1. Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
  2. The Irishman
  3. Parasite
  4. Marriage Story
  5. 1917
  6. Little Women
  7. Joker
  8. Jojo Rabbit
  9. The Farewell
  10. Knives Out
 
Director
  1. Quentin Tarantino, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
  2. Martin Scorsese, The Irishman
  3. Bong Joon-ho, Parasite
  4. Sam Mendes, 1917
  5. Greta Gerwig, Little Women

 

Best Actor

  1. Adam Driver, Marriage Story
  2. Joaquin Phoenix, Joker
  3. Leonardo DiCaprio, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
  4. Robert DeNiro, The Irishman
  5. Adam Sandler, Uncut Gems
     
    Best Actress
  1. Scarlett Johansson, Marriage Story
  2. Rene Zellweger, Judy
  3. Lupita Nyong’o, Us
  4. Saorise Ronan, Little Women
  5. Awkafina, The Farewell
     
    Best Supporting Actor
  1. Brad Pitt, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
  2. Joe Pesci, The Irishman
  3. Al Pacino, The Irishman
  4. Tom Hanks, A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood
  5. Willem Dafoe, The Lighthouse
     
    Best Supporting Actress
  1. Laura Dern, Marriage Story
  2. Florence Pugh, Little Women
  3. Margot Robbie, Bombshell
  4. Zhao Shuzen, The Farewell
  5. Jennifer Lopez, Hustlers
     
    Best Original Screenplay
  1. Marriage Story – Noah Baumbach
  2. Once Upon a Time in Hollywood – Quentin Tarantino
  3. Parasite – Bong Joon-ho & Han Jin Won
  4. The Farewell – Lulu Wang
  5. Knives Out – Rian Johnson
     
    Best Adapted Screenplay
  1. The Irishman – Steven Zallian
  2. Little Women – Greta Gerwig
  3. Jojo Rabbit – Taika Waititi
  4. A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood – Micah Fitzerman-Blue & Noah Harpster
  5. The Two Popes – Anthony McCarten
     
    Best Documentary

1.       Apollo 11

2.       American Factory

3.       Honeyland

4.       For Sama

5.       The Biggest Little Farm

 

Best Animated Film                                    

  1. Toy Story 4
  2. Frozen II
  3. How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World
  4. Missing Link
  5. I Lost My Body
 
Best International Film
  1. Parasite – South Korea
  2. Pain & Glory – Spain
  3. Les Miserables – France
  4. The Painted Bird – Czech Republic
  5. Beanpole - Russia
 
Best Cinematography

1.       1917 – Roger Deakins

2.       Once Upon a Time in Hollywood – Robert Richardson

3.       The Irishman – Rodrigo Prieto

4.       Parasite – Kyung-pyo Hong

5.       Portrait of a Lady on Fire – Claire Mathon

 

Editing

1.       The Irishman

2.       Once Upon a Time in Hollywood

3.       Parasite

4.       Ford V. Ferrari

5.       Joker

 

Score

1.    Marriage Story – Randy Newman

2.    1917 – Thomas Newman

3.    Joker - Hildur Guðnadóttir

4.    Little Women – Alexandre Desplat

5.    Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker – John Williams

 

Song

  1. Frozen II – Into the Unknown
  2. Rocketman – (I’m Gonna) Love Me Again
  3. Harriet – Stand Up
  4. Toy Story 4 – I Can’t Let You Throw Yourself Away
  5. The Lion King – Spirit

 

Production Design

  1. 1917
  2. Parasite
  3. Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
  4. The Irishman
  5. Knives Out
 

Costume Design

  1. Dolemite is My Name
  2. Rocketman
  3. Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
  4. Little Women
  5. Downton Abbey
 
Make-Up & Hair Styling

1.    Bombshell

2.    Joker

3.    Dolemite is My Name

4.    Once Upon a Time in Hollywood

5.    1917

 

Sound Mixing

  1. Ford V Ferrari
  2. Rocketman
  3. Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
  4. Joker
  5. 1917
 

Sound Editing

  1. Ford V. Ferrari
  2. 1917
  3. Joker
  4. Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
  5. Avengers: Endgame
 
Visual Effects
  1. The Lion King
  2. Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker
  3. Alita Battle Angel
  4. Avengers: Endgame
  5. The Irishman

The Films of Jean-Pierre Melville: Un Flic (1972)

Un Flic (1972)
Directed by: Jean-Pierre Melville.
Written by: Jean-Pierre Melville.
Starring: Alain Delon (Commissaire Edouard Coleman), Richard Crenna (Simon), Catherine Deneuve (Cathy), Riccardo Cucciolla (Paul Weber), Michael Conrad (Louis Costa), Paul Crauchet (Morand), Simone Valère (Paul's wife), André Pousse (Marc Albouis), Jean Desailly (Distinguished gentleman who was robbed a statue), Valérie Wilson (Gaby).
 
There are many sad things about Jean-Pierre Melville dying early – at only 55. Just looking at his career accomplishments, he died before most people realized what a master filmmaker he was – his masterpiece, Army of Shadows had been buried, and little seen, and during his career he never quite seemed to be in favor – always a little ahead of the curve. Another career aspect that is somewhat sad is that Un Flic was Melville’s final film. It’s a fine film as far as it goes – although by this point, he could pretty much do this type of thing in his sleep, and to be honest, there are moments when he seems to be doing that in Un Flic. It is another crime drama, another film about the thin line between cops and criminals, with long stretches without a lot of dialogue as master professionals go about their business, and criminals either violate, or refuse to violate, the code of ratting on each other, etc. I said about Le Cercle Rouge, his previous film, that it was masterfully done – but having watched so many Melville films over a few months’ span, I wondered if there was enough different about it to make it one of his very best. With Un Flic, I know there isn’t. There are still sequences here that are great – and it’s still very much a Jean-Pierre Melville film – which means there are things here most directors couldn’t do at all. So even minor Melville is better than a lot of films – but it’s still undeniably minor.
 
There are two main set pieces in Un Flic – and they are both wonderfully staged, and show Melville’s fascination with the small things that go into pulling off a job. The four main criminals, led by Richard Crenna’s Simon, pull off two heists in the movie. One is at a bank, and another is aboard a moving train, on which he is dropped from a helicopter. And yet although Melville could clearly make robberies look exciting, he spends more time setting up the heists, than the heists themselves. In the first, the criminals sit, minute after agonizing minute, for just the right moment for the heist to begin – they spend longer waiting, then they do in the robbery. For the train robbery, it almost feels like we spend more time Simon as he prepares a disguise for himself on board the train – changing into pajamas and an overcoat, slicking back his hair, etc. – so that he will appear to any witnesses as a passenger with insomnia. That Melville spends more time on this than he does with Simon get onto a train from a helicopter, committing a robbery, and then getting back on the helicopter, tells you something.
 
Simon is only one half of the coin here though – in fact, Un Flic means cop, and that would be Alain Delon’s Coleman. He is investigating the bank robbery – which he suspects may or may not involve his friend Simon, but as with everything else in the film, he is doing so half-heartedly. We see him investigate other crimes, and not really care. He is sleeping with Cathy (Catherine Deneuve), who is also sleeping with Simon (which is odd since Delon and Crenna look and act the same, you think she may want some variety, but I guess not) but even this love triangle doesn’t inspire much passion in any of the three participants. They cannot be bothered to get worked up over much of anything.
 
So ultimately ends up feeling like a crime drama about a cop and a criminal who have lost their passion for everything, and are just going through the motions – made a filmmaker who is going through the motions. Like his characters, Melville is so good at his good that even just going through the motions is still pretty darn good. And his trademark style, and the way he liked to drain the actors of emotions anyway, means its less noticeable for Melville than it would be for many other filmmakers. And yet, that’s still what it feels like just the same.
 
I do wonder what Melville would have done had he not died at 55. For a filmmaker who was able to make Le Deuxième Souffle in his late 40s – a film that feels like an old master’s final statement on something – I think it could have fascinating. Of course, we will never know how Melville would have evolved – or not evolved – had he lived longer, and we didn’t get the grand final statement from him. We got Un Flic – and film that is undeniably the work of the same filmmaker who made all those masterpieces – but a film that feels like perhaps his heart was no longer in making those films anymore.

Movie Review: Les Miserables

Les Misérables **** / *****
Directed by: Ladj Ly.
Written by: Ladj Ly & Giordano Gederlini & Alexis Manenti.
Starring: Damien Bonnard (Brigadier Stéphane Ruiz, dit Pento), Alexis Manenti (Chris), Djibril Zonga (Gwada), Issa Perica (Issa), Al-Hassan Ly (Buzz), Steve Tientcheu (Le Maire), Almamy Kanoute (Salah), Nizar Ben Fatma (La Pince), Raymond Lopez (Zorro), Luciano Lopez (Luciano), Jaihson Lopez (Jaihson), Jeanne Balibar (La commissaire), Sana Joachaim (Bintou), Lucas Omiri (Slim), Rocco Lopez (Rocco), Diego Lopez (Diego), Omar Soumare (Macha), Abdelkader Hogguy (Amar), Djeneba Diallo (Mère Issa), Abiatou Château (Sadjo), Fodjé Sissoko (Jojo), Mousba Harb (Mère Gwada), Améline Fanta Gandega (Maman africaine), Sofia Lesaffre (Lycéenne), Marine Sainsily (Femme Chris), Alexandre Picot (Bob). 
 
Ladj Ly’s narrative debut film, Les Miserables, takes its name from the Victor Hugo classic, because it takes place in the same area of Paris that Hugo observed all that time ago – and which Ly is observing now. While much has changed in the intervening years, also very little has changed – the police are still oppressing the poor, who eventually are going to get fed up and rise up in violent protest. The faces have changed; the story remains the same.
 
The film focuses on a trio of cops who patrol the largely black, largely Muslim, largely immigrant community that they don’t really understand. It is Stephane’s (Damien Bonnard) first day with this group – and he’s going to get an education on what “these streets” mean, that will clash with his own code of right and wrong. He isn’t a rookie cop – but he’s just transferred in from the suburbs, so of course he doesn’t “get it”. Chris (Alexis Manenti) is the leader of the trio – and you know all you need to know of him when you discover his nickname is “Pink Pig” – and he embraces it. He is a collection of misogyny and racism – and gets off on his power. When he frisks a trio of teenage girls, it’s more because he can then anything else. His longtime partner is Gwada (Djibril Zonga) – who grew up in this area, but if he once had the idealism we see in Stephane, it’s gone now. The film opens on a scene of unity – as we see young Issa (Issa Perica) and his friends celebrating as France wins the World Cup. Everyone is happy then – everyone is “French” – but it won’t be long before he’s back in his area – and the police will be back to their old ways – with Issa at the heart of it.
 
The film owes an obvious debt to Spike Lee’s Do the Right Thing – it basically takes place over one long day in this area, where tensions start to mount until they reach a point where they going to explode. Ly doesn’t even try to hide this very much – he even has a character known as the Mayor – not a real Mayor, but a kind of guy who keeps a watchful eye over everything, and keeps people in line (although he’s more corrupt than Ossie Davis’ Da Mayor in Lee’s film).
 
Ly does make some weird story choices in the film though – none more so than the inciting incident being the theft of a lion cub for the circus that is passing through town. Why he does this is beyond me – but it is rather silly at times. Issa is, of course, the thief – the sort of stupid childish thing kids do (the trio of cops figure it out seeing Issa’s post on Instagram). This leads to conflict – which will end with Gwada firing a flashbang into Issa’s face – it won’t kill him, but will leave him bloody and banged up. But it is Chris who goes insane in the wake of this – figuring out that another kid with a drone filmed the whole thing, which leads Chris to go on the attack to track it down – lest the video come up, and tensions explode.
 
They are going to anyway – Issa, who we first see as a mischievous, yet smiling child will become permanently changed by this. His bloody face by the end is no longer smiling, and he is not going to stop being angry every again. And not just at the cops – but at the whole system that runs his neighborhood.
 
The violence that ends Les Miserables is visceral and exciting and a long time coming. It does feel more than a little reverse engineered to get there than actually occurring naturally (perhaps because other than Issa, none of the other children really stand out as characters). But like in Spike Lee’s film, the villain here is just the individual cops – they are only so responsible for the corrupt system in which they operate. Even Stephane, who we see an idealist, is far from innocent here. Even his view of the status quo isn’t good enough for these kids – won’t leave them unharmed. There are so clumsy moments in Ly’s film – but it’s power and anger are justify those missteps along the way, and lead to a film that is tough to shake.